Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
After watching this video, i decided to dedicate myself to learn AI not to devel…
ytc_UgyF5b6yd…
G
I’m a little bit late and this is a bit off topic, but I think AI will never tru…
ytc_Ugxi8r5OY…
G
The majority of people dont care about the process, they care about the result. …
ytc_UgxatswSW…
G
these guys are literally are tarnishing the value of art , movies. dont they not…
ytc_UgzaMAn-q…
G
I stopped watching Jazza years ago, when he first kept pushing a.i. after we all…
ytr_Ugww_ilR1…
G
I agree that AI art is probably one of the most annoying things on the internet …
ytc_UgyiV2vA2…
G
How AI will dominate the future. people will depend on AI, AI will dominate the …
ytc_UgwomXK8p…
G
"*Big Tech fuels 'growth' with crime*" is a bit overdramatic.
Google deliberat…
rdc_mss2ucr
Comment
as someone who is fairly skilled at writing myself, and isn't particularly against the concept of AI (just capitalism), i would NEVER use AI to write something. it takes out the joy of writing myself, the human element, and the desire for complete control over my work. i don't have an ethical problem with just using AI, but to use it for something like NaNoWriMo just seems to completely defeat the purpose. i don't have a problem to use AI for editing or proofreading, but to support completely generating content with a computer without little human interaction then acting like the human who used the AI did something incredible and impressive is obviously ludicrous. i think the only people receiving credit for AI achievements are the people who designed the AI algorithm itself. THAT is the humanity in AI. humans made it. but that doesn't mean you can just use it for anything, especially if it defeats the purpose of a challenge. the fact that NaNo won't specify this seems really weird on their part.
youtube
2024-09-16T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgxUxTmrQt_6RQt38ER4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9DVi8eRUE2qTSexp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzYF6hXOql6XVWW8h54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziRVCcPrZqksEtnzN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-3R8l5NUo24OMov54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFF74kZf1iXevCWHF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_WgA6D5tDDomMVMl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7Nk4aPLlXmhaxdhh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyK_3UROgOVanrOZ2x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiuzSxGyFEMUdMpN14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"})