Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The only good thing coming out of blanket surveillance is that it will never be …
ytc_Ugy2cuTNU…
G
AI isn't intelligent... not when the "monster" or humans change it's programming…
ytc_UgwbAAQXi…
G
The secret 2 finding out whether something is ai or not:
1. The light reflectio…
ytc_UgzRoM9VG…
G
This is not the case for all, as it is today; workers in rice fields, those livi…
ytc_Ugypx6Oht…
G
Fun fact: A recent study made in the University of Michigan (the paper's called …
ytc_UgxyROfys…
G
“I don’t fully agree — building a global platform takes more than emotional inte…
ytc_Ugx75Wq1g…
G
UBI (Universal Basic Income) will be the only way people will survive -- and sti…
ytc_UgwHm7LxP…
G
don't call it AI art, it just legitimizes prompt-ists. it's not art, and that's …
ytc_UgyxoXEIm…
Comment
as someone who is fairly skilled at writing myself, and isn't particularly against the concept of AI (just capitalism), i would NEVER use AI to write something. it takes out the joy of writing myself, the human element, and the desire for complete control over my work. i don't have an ethical problem with just using AI, but to use it for something like NaNoWriMo just seems to completely defeat the purpose. i don't have a problem to use AI for editing or proofreading, but to support completely generating content with a computer without little human interaction then acting like the human who used the AI did something incredible and impressive is obviously ludicrous. i think the only people receiving credit for AI achievements are the people who designed the AI algorithm itself. THAT is the humanity in AI. humans made it. but that doesn't mean you can just use it for anything, especially if it defeats the purpose of a challenge. the fact that NaNo won't specify this seems really weird on their part.
youtube
2024-09-16T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgxUxTmrQt_6RQt38ER4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9DVi8eRUE2qTSexp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzYF6hXOql6XVWW8h54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgziRVCcPrZqksEtnzN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-3R8l5NUo24OMov54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFF74kZf1iXevCWHF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_WgA6D5tDDomMVMl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7Nk4aPLlXmhaxdhh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyK_3UROgOVanrOZ2x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiuzSxGyFEMUdMpN14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"})