Raw LLM Responses

I'm sorry but no. If I look at some of your art, take inspiration from it, and draw a picture with your art as inspiration, you can't copyright my work(this is essentially what the AI is doing). You try and differentiate human art and AI art by saying that human art is somehow more legitimate because their life experiences change the outcome of the art. The same argument can be made for AI, each AI can be trained differently with different datasets and deep learning models. 5:13 The difference is that the precedent, as stated above, has NOT been set in a court yet. Other than Matthew Buttericks case against github-copilot no REAL legal action has been against any AI of this type, and to put it simply the music industry is a lot bigger and scarier than independent artists. It doesn't necessarily mean they're doing anything wrong but instead covering their asses. Stability AI is not the law and even if they were, that doesn't address the fact that researchers do not have to follow the same laws regarding copyright and the biggest researchers into AI right now are currently non-profit. 7:29 Cool, then what about countries that don't care about US copyright? Do you think the consumer is going to care if they get their AI-generated image from China instead of the USA? How are you going to protect your art? You can try to push regulation in and delay it for a year or two until other countries catch up and you're gonna be in the exact same spot you are now. To end When the car was invented, people found no need for horse-drawn carriages, the coachmen who drove them adapted and became taxi drivers, but the horses that pulled them and couldn't adapt were culled. We are now in a time where we are going to find out if artists are coachmen or horses.