Raw LLM Responses

**does the deep inhale**...first off; that's not coloring, that's rendering. 2nd of all: while they are his work. the only way I can honestly call it is "throwing the bones of his creation and hitting the randomizer button over and over again until he finds a style he likes." I wouldn't call it a creative process... more like... shopping... for a style. 3rd: (is suffering 2nd hand embarrassment after watching the photoshoping of removing the metal stockings) ... I don't want to be mean about this. I really don't. But he does... not have... the foundational skills to render shadows over muscles and joints. And to make adjustments like that compared to whole compositions consistent render is...something. 4th: His argument about the Vangoh recreation of Millet's Sower is not a good example. He'd be better off comparing a realist landscape painting to the recent invention of the photograph. Which is a fair argument if its acceptable if a photocopied image of real life verses an artist skills leading them to the ability to paint realistically as possible are the same. And to our understanding of Ai art so far, the real danger is that they have been known to rip off the styles of artists. 5th:... if you're gunna boast about having strengths in anatomy... I think commenting on that would be hitting well below the *knees* 6th: If you're gunna say you reference things... show us the references. For person who keeps bringing up being good at an anatomy, I would be shocked if he doesn't have a backlog of bookmarks or save files filled with anatomical refences. god forbid you'd be *hands* free. 7th: (oh look at that he actually used the photography argument) There's a fine like with realism and originality, and the fact is, just like how a camera cannot take a picture of your inner thoughts, it can only take from reality, Ai generative art cannot function without the original input of pictures, photographed or otherwise. Which is the crux of the issue. It. Still. Takes.