Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
ChatGPT is supposed to give a neutral response based on all the data it can get,…
ytc_UgyKxIU8L…
G
It has been trained on recordings of human speech, which has stutters and sounds…
ytr_UgxxZBd3_…
G
Just shows we’re not ready for driverless cars. The technology is not fully ther…
ytc_Ugyv6HjWr…
G
You doing a video about deepfake? Wow, you guys are in the front, so progressive…
ytc_Ugz5gBN3q…
G
100 years? lol try more like 10 years and ai will be smarter than humans…
ytc_Ugzv6AkrQ…
G
Fascinating! However AI is not as advanced as he says! Also the leaders of the B…
ytc_Ugz4ufUBe…
G
I'm actually shocked you didn't touch on the reason most artists are mad at AI a…
ytc_UgxD8eQBX…
G
I think everybody should pay attention to me on this AI was to be helpful to hum…
ytc_Ugx5oELiD…
Comment
Elon Musk said, "I think the world should know what was that reason?", which makes me cringe, as it should be "I think the world should know what that reason was." Can you break down his mistake in grammar terms?
ChatGPT
Elon Musk's sentence, "I think the world should know what was that reason?" seems awkward due to the placement of "was." In standard English grammar, the correct structure is "I think the world should know what that reason was."
The mistake lies in the inversion of the subject ("that reason") and the linking verb ("was"). In Musk's sentence, the word order disrupts the typical sequence, making it sound less natural. The corrected version follows the more conventional subject-verb-object order, resulting in a smoother and grammatically correct sentence.
User
I would simply say that he should have used an indirect question rather than what is effectively a sentence fragment and a question bolted together. Am I right?
ChatGPT
Yes, you're absolutely right. Employing an indirect question would have made the sentence clearer and more grammatically sound. Instead of combining a sentence fragment and a direct question, using an indirect question structure would have improved the sentence's coherence and readability.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-01-01T22:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZURB72pN-H0rj1E14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0rQ6F8W3yOfM5CGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9ucjPjRSa6i5psNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTtmnNWGcKuZlMNCN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6TZlT67za1HQxP4Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy8vtt-SmOS66rlep4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwumRVU0VKnHdpT_uN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbKfkDOzcD6cdwE0t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwveza6vDs8F_e5-sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3DzDJADYaMeQwrg94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]