Raw LLM Responses

I've been saying this for ages. Making AI art is an actual artistic skill. Well, if you consider coding an artistic skill, which i do because there is beautiful code and horrendous code. AI art is a tool, but AI art just happens to draw in the scum of humanity so the output is very often just that. But if someone with an unwavering creative vision and the skills to wrangle AI, they can get something absolutely beautiful out of it. So in my head, you still need someone quite creative and well experienced to create the art, even if it's AI art. Even with everything i've said, artists will still be vital even far into the future. I've created AI art for a game i was making (non-commercial) but it frustrated me to no end because whatever it gave me did not fit my vision. So i had to scrap it all. I know i can hire an AI artist and they could deliver me exactly what i want (90% accuracy) but at that point i should just get a real artist instead, the price point is very different, of course. But it's about letting a secondary person into my creative vision that mattered to me. The important point is, yes the AI tool can give me what i yell at it, but it can't tell me that i'm being stupid or that something won't work, nor will it give me the second best thing to fit what i'm saying, or give advice to truly bring out my idea. AI art is lazy, and it very much is by design. Tools are lazy. You used to draw with your fingers, then you drew with pens, now you draw with a mouse. I'd argue that is a lazy evolution. The artist is more than just a tool, however. They're gut feelings, experience, opinions and so on. The only artistic jobs i've seen AI replace so far are soulless. A brand logo is not an artistic masterpiece, it's annoying and loud. No art entirely devoid of humans have captured peoples imaginations yet, and i highly doubt it will for quite some time. The show used in this video was directed and story boarded by a human. It very much is a human product. And i get that a lot of people would argue against that point, but it is. Sure, AI art is the equivalent of a noise map, but if you keep refining that noise map to the point it starts looking like sprawling galaxies, that is art in my opinion and you'll never make me change my mind on that. And as a response to the point made in the second half of the video. I think it's very unfair to tell people how they're allowed to be creative. I've never been a fan of gate keeping, especially not in art discussions. And just because you feel morally or ethically justified in doing it does not make it any better in my opinion.