Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@ginamaria245 Or imagine if Waymos were equipped with missile launchers and one …
ytr_UgxECwx0j…
G
Yep, and GPT-5 without thinking is SHOCKINGLY bad. A hallucination machine like …
rdc_nt6gbm2
G
We dont create because we want money, we create things because its FUN. I love b…
ytc_Ugw0fZ6pB…
G
My cynical scenario is that AI will be captured by a few elites who already own …
ytc_UgwGMt0F7…
G
I think people creating scare in public by saying everything will be replaced by…
ytc_UgwZedKEi…
G
I can create 4 second sora2 based open source videos on my home pc after less th…
ytr_UgwxbNcKh…
G
Detroit Become human is becoming more and more close at this time, i think if th…
ytc_UgwMMaj7w…
G
The best was to protect humans for AI is to embed it with a conscience and appre…
ytc_UgxJ5Vh4b…
Comment
In my view, the "Chinese Room" is NOT POSSIBLE outside thought experiments. We cannot use it to say AI doesn't understand, as that assertions is not scientific once you analyze the thought experiment. Its' core premise is entirely flawed. There is no 'book of phrases' that could ever hope to convincingly make the person in the room seem fluent in Chinese, it would have to be nearly infinite in size, containing every possible response to every possible combination of questions assemble with language, or the user would have to spend an incredible amount of time, essentially learning Chinese in the process.
Prior to LLMs, which are the thing in question here, even our best language translation software could not convince a fluent speaker. So you cannot say AI is the only example of a Philosophical Zombies. Philosophical zombies do not exist outside thought experiments either. There is no example of any such thing in our natural world, and AI cannot be the only example, or we are proving nothing. It's not a comparison.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-10T15:3…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw8YT20Q93sMTVqNd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHj_F15n6L0vIlwl94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGSOXZqbDo-VM41fR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSCBfrFaxcq7IkS114AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzE_xZAPqlnU0jeMXN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzaevmGpm74yW6ahp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFQAV87LRPzQMo34V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzsm2L8syPTfvMgXY54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY7r-hzdYKAnqrklp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznkdvbfX0SK_mfQLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]