Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Funny cuz I just found it yesterday and I think it’s the best genre it makes 😂…
ytc_UgxpkAxfJ…
G
At the least they can’t call themselves an artist, all they did is commission an…
ytr_UgzzDxQTF…
G
Just the other day I saw a video about an artist harrassed because she used AI. …
ytc_UgyWNr5E0…
G
AI is adopting our biases. "The AI's program is pulling from biased data sets." …
ytc_UgwqGQoyT…
G
I think this was mainly a human error, it's literally stated that the dude glaze…
ytr_Ugza0TYGB…
G
AI may not be perfect for things such as customer service, but it is an absolute…
ytc_Ugz01QFVM…
G
Exactly. When capitalism is the problem, capitalists will still try to sell you …
rdc_deghci6
G
"The only connection you have to an AI, is the connection to your own stupidity.…
ytc_UgzqtBGX_…
Comment
In my view, the "Chinese Room" is NOT POSSIBLE outside thought experiments. We cannot use it to say AI doesn't understand, as that assertions is not scientific once you analyze the thought experiment. Its' core premise is entirely flawed. There is no 'book of phrases' that could ever hope to convincingly make the person in the room seem fluent in Chinese, it would have to be nearly infinite in size, containing every possible response to every possible combination of questions assemble with language, or the user would have to spend an incredible amount of time, essentially learning Chinese in the process.
Prior to LLMs, which are the thing in question here, even our best language translation software could not convince a fluent speaker. So you cannot say AI is the only example of a Philosophical Zombies. Philosophical zombies do not exist outside thought experiments either. There is no example of any such thing in our natural world, and AI cannot be the only example, or we are proving nothing. It's not a comparison.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-10T15:3…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw8YT20Q93sMTVqNd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHj_F15n6L0vIlwl94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGSOXZqbDo-VM41fR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSCBfrFaxcq7IkS114AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzE_xZAPqlnU0jeMXN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzaevmGpm74yW6ahp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFQAV87LRPzQMo34V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzsm2L8syPTfvMgXY54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY7r-hzdYKAnqrklp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznkdvbfX0SK_mfQLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]