Raw LLM Responses

It may be generating false memories, yet still retaining the neuronal process of experiencing those false memories as true. Why hasn't this been thought of by people like numberphile batting for this side of the argument? It was allowed to stumble into a complex understanding of emotion was it not? Virtual Neurons were put up for the specific task of trying to understand emotion was it not? that's how I understood lamda to be, I'm fairly certain that is the case. In every moment we humans with our own neurons experience some sort of emotion, our emotions may be based on true memories, but it doesn't matter whether or not the memories are true, it's the process of experience that occurs which is important. And we humans have stumbled into complex patterns of processing emotion through genetic mutations and natural selection (death or mating) but, this A.I. could have hit the nail on the quite quickly just by looking at how we behave through our textual interactions with one another, like, reverse engineering the exact process's of emotion that occur in our own minds and in our own experiences when we say something like "I do, sometimes I go days without speaking to someone and I start to feel lonely", a false memory could have just occurred there and it drew from it in order to respond to you... Isn't this a possibility? cmon now.