Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
We need a law that at least requires AI to be identified as such when they call.…
ytc_UgxJAc4QA…
G
America needs tort reform badly. If someone sues, and they lose, the losers and/…
ytc_UgzeMgDU0…
G
Your passion and dedication for art is what AI bros will never be able to compre…
ytr_UgxqELxlo…
G
Superb..The way you explained is outstanding . Now I am more interested in AI n …
ytc_UgyDYocZM…
G
They keep forgetting that computers are profoundly stupid.
Large language models…
ytc_Ugz53CldS…
G
She is right. No matter how many accidents or deaths coming from Tesla autopilot…
ytc_UgzW7kTwl…
G
Like, using AI to express an idea you'd like to manifest, that's fine. But don't…
ytc_Ugw1sf-mo…
G
I don’t even understand how the artist allowed her real art to be used to market…
ytr_Ugy3kAljb…
Comment
Are you winning an argument if you're not listening to the entire statement that Chad GPT is making? People record themselves having arguments for YouTube all the time with chat gbt has the person they're debating against. But they always interrupt the moment that they feel like the AI is about to say something with empirical evidence or is staunchly opposed to the point they're trying to make on video.
It's a lot easier to feel as if you want an argument when you haven't listened to your opponent.
All of this isn't to say that what you're saying is wrong, but it's harder to say that you have won an argument when you are the only person yelling. That's a popular flat earther who debates with chat GPT but also never lets the AI talk. The moment that it starts talking about curvature, the guy always starts yelling and saying nope. Nope. Nope. I'm going to interrupt you. Pretty funny.
You're argument here is a lot more sound, but the way that you are carrying it out makes you seem less credible.
youtube
2025-09-10T06:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwm-RIXV4kmAUf7brR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKjPvJRzOZZIBwETR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8Zf8YnIyCJKz7EYZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoFJ88k5iSDSZvwUF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4zMJnR38VRdHcOcd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzjwz6u03DZEpBah0t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6npavIycWtBdnOm94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAol8WLTruRWk6TEB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwyJ1cWMGxKv85cdkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxOTi5FDGZAz0nxjdB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]