Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
They are investing in something that they have created and they are doing this t…
ytc_UgzAnx7YE…
G
Some AI is terrible. You ask it questions that you know the answers to and it g…
ytc_UgxXUp7KY…
G
I'm not a robot wind me up please and I will do it for you…
ytc_Ugx4J3KzA…
G
There are many ways to identify bot vs human users they could use if they wanted…
rdc_ohymoz7
G
Nvidia should get right onto that, and stop selling that company chips.
Oh, who…
rdc_lub7nd2
G
Unfortunately the “predictive AI is problematic” has happened many times. For in…
ytc_UgzypZgsv…
G
@good6894 That's literally not true at all. How do you feel now that your precio…
ytr_UgzkHiDQ4…
G
YALL WE NEED TO CANCEL AI ART RN SOMEONE WHO DIDNT KNOW HOW TO ART, HAD THE AUDA…
ytc_UgyMjkMy1…
Comment
There needs to be an art piece for an AI to make a image, remove the artists and you get no ai images. The ai company is stealing the artist's work. (I explained this so bad, help)
Edit: Basically it's like a character creator! Someone who used it and posted a picture of what they made still gets to 'kinda' claim the design of their character, but they'll give credit to the artist as it would never have even existed without the artist spending time adding their pictures to make the creator.
A artist might need to sell their work to put food on the table, etc. Artist can't just draw themselves money to buy things with, pictures aren't just spawned onto the internet, and there's paper & pencil, free digital programs, etc. for the 'poor people who deserve to make art too'.
I myself use a free program and can give you some names if you can't find any :D (This goes to any artists that actually want to learn too <33)
I agree, I think it should at least be an opt in type of ordeal, or pay the artists for their work after they choose to opt in.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-25T03:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwUbPxfVEl7qdczXvx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfuzH7P_3-FL3kUIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8kboSuW8tQEHiurF4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUUg8yOEssvpPtZ3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTrjLl7Dc6B2KQAzl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw37-nlAV8h-Dt2Z4J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXn1kZVjXmir4qPMF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw25tgCaAYYtdM-IjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyJcL3wYrUNnq3wudB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy1fK1DeCs7gdcjlx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]