Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Banning technology does not, and can never, work. ESPECIALLY when the tools nece… rdc_eu5vhtl G 36:45 it seems so obvious now that Altman would shift from Y Combinator to lead … ytc_UgyqlWAWb… G Yeah this guy is definitely on the side of the devil sorry all you elon muskrat … ytc_UgwTjzE3b… G But people are already noticing AI patterns, music, scripts, and art and we want… ytc_UgyWRYQ0e… G nah, the AI is not racist nor sexist... its the data gathered from the internet,… ytr_Ugx6FwQkq… G Have you ever met anyone with AI psychosis or have you just watched the Youtube … ytr_UgwliVf6e… G You don’t need to wonder about the robots that had to be shut down because the r… ytc_UgxH-O6li… G The only thing that happens is masses of people are expected to do nothing profe… ytc_UgzkeJPnC…

Comment

Doesn't labeling the videos as DeepFakes limit any sort of prosecution? I mean, if they were trying to claim that they were real, I'd see that argument, but the crux of their complaint seems not to be a defamation of character, but that it feels gross to be depicted in such a manner. And the majority of people being affected by this are entertainers, public figures, who likenesses are not protected. Wouldn't that make DeepFakes a form of Free Speech? Like a satirist cartoon, or a Tijuana Bible? This really just seems like one of those realities of fame that people are never prepared themselves for. It sucks for the people feeling victimized, but wouldn't trying to codify what counts as a public figure or what counts as pornography ultimately lead to the dissolution of Free Speech as a whole? Of course, I've never been satirized in such a way and likely never will, so I can't realistically understand the pain that that could bring and it's possible that if I was my opinion on the matter could change, but as it stands, I feel like Free Speech is more important..

youtube AI Harm Incident 2023-05-21T18:0…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	user
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxadZl_JXdW0oa7yeZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwxknOLhF7llRK0WYh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPbRJffNep7XgIYvF4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKEvIo0Ybp81UcRed4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxtODuKidhOkuzFGp54AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy81m1BJhy-HttivZB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkiD5DqS2mqy1EYVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyE6vHx1lrKFE0T9MJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwR_XE4VMmrNh-G2TB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwC3-GymYnPiHMWVv14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}
]

Raw LLM Responses