Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Have you used chatgpt I fired all my graphic designer, it's just the beginning …
ytr_Ugzan-wd4…
G
would there also be a news article about this actress breaking down in tears if …
rdc_lgmu8p4
G
Almost ALL of the ads during this were for AI and tech. Depressing irony. We are…
ytc_UgxgNxfiE…
G
i think ai art is technically impressive, and sometimes even visually so, but wi…
ytr_UgwLMuNHe…
G
It's definitely a surprising perspective from Sophia! Her take on wisdom and the…
ytr_UgwOFyZ1W…
G
So many youtubers came to criticize a single idea about a "sacriledge" idea. Eve…
ytc_UgwLlugQU…
G
The genie is out of the bottle, and different countries with adversarial relatio…
ytr_UgzDg5Af2…
G
You know why they are getting rid of all these people, musk wants to replace pe…
ytr_Ugw_Laar4…
Comment
The empirical method is most reliable in finding truth in the physical world. It employs the logic of mathematics in finding most probable outcome given a controlled set of variables. Religions are not concerned with that, and often depend upon intuition, emotions and customs not dependent upon objective reality found in scientific endeavors like physics.
Given that it is generally understood in the scientific community that the universe came from a single massive event, to begin to understand where we came from, there must be a theory that has reliable, predictive ability,
There is always the unknown (or "God of the gap"), like when questioning the origin of the initial mass; but that is not required in order to posit the question, "Given initial conditions like a single mass (nothing can be simpler or more ordered the one), aka,, 'cosmic egg' or 'primal atom,' how did that initial mass (generally accepted as most probable by all of the scientific community) transform to become the universe seen today?"
Again, there is no 100% certainty. The closest to that is found in abstract math. In application there is always a uncertainty, like when counting apples,.
There are two most-probable, very basic answers to "The Question," ie, top down cosmology OR bottom up cosmology-- both are incompatible with one another.
Given this, top down cosmology, when properly understood, is broad enough to predict everything so far seen. like that by the JWST, for example, while bottom up (Big Bang or Standard Model) cosmology must be constantly revised with ad hoc explanations every time there is a new finding, top down cosmology wins!
Top down is not properly understood, because it is commonly interpreted to mean that there are many realities caused by cascading events; but this is not the case, because everything seen and unseen remains causally connected by quantum entanglement.
"The universe is not locally real (Nobel Prize already awarded)."
Do not be deceived. Basic understanding of the universe comes before all else.
Religion or science? Choose!
PS: AI just may be the critical mass or "one-hundredth monkey" needed for a dramatic paradigm shift.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-07-22T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxALpHS7YkG_rWQoXF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxl9AzofNxpOOoSiMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjSE10eJCfoRvxuNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy__zuHMejuSbCTDqd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwxjO2Hj17Bh-4FzlJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwnPi92dN6gjSBaapp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxsm_p7N1BtTOnzfxt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0DEhBy4fMmv7wtRd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdqpg-_NHNV9GKEQd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4JFN25TQczsJ8PUh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]