Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Ronin You completely missed the point. The video made no claim that there are an…
ytr_UgwT3t4FS…
G
If these companies want to replace manual labor with AI, then the one thing the …
ytc_UgyZMhLpD…
G
There’s also programs where you have brushes of different colors representing te…
ytr_UgxFpAceH…
G
The funny thing is; Ai, is working and we aren't. That means, why make a product…
ytc_UgwRX9PMM…
G
Been using Pneumatic Workflow to automate my farm’s routine tasks; the role-base…
ytc_Ugw1o8AnP…
G
Guys ai will help radiologist to make reading 10 ctscans in same time previousl…
ytc_UgzVUVDlP…
G
only thing ai does is to make the expectations highere than before. Like any oth…
ytc_UgzLRU_YR…
G
Top speech from Dr. Julia. Very insightful and informative about how AI datasets…
ytc_UgwdHqutg…
Comment
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Roman, especially when it comes to super intelligence. I find the implications of super intelligence to be terrifying and a threat to the human race. Narrow intelligence, as we have now can be very beneficial to the world. Super intelligence will threaten humans inevitable extinction. Robots don’t need to be fed. They work 24 seven etc. etc.. I have been thinking about how we could program AI and stop super intelligence from destroying the human race Women have an instinctive protection mechanism for their children, just like a she bear will do anything to protect her Cubs if she feels them threaten in any way. In order to protect the human race from extinction, is it possible that we could somehow program AI to incorporate that instinctive protection so that they would not destroy us and look up upon us the same as she bears do with their Cubs and humans do with their children? What do you think of this idea as a security measure against super intelligence?
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T19:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_bV1jwLAjuNilkOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxeb0e3BsIISpa6Qr54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTDdEgXsZ7_fOv1OV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztFGr4QwQqe2QA7kR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfMH21s_XWjLyY2Sx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWStSA1qosnBpGQvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjkcyiXxGHu13gCAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx79llVT16gbB0P6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsGLDsfs5jZMktyDh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJXvUbV2lGnUpDP-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]