Raw LLM Responses

AI isn’t ruining education, the education system is failing students and they’re using AI as a result of the information not being tailored to them and what they want to learn about. The problem is ENTIRELY this stupid regressive biased education system from the 1970s which needs drastic improvement. Give students a lesson that interests them and makes them feel like a part of something and watch them fly. Give them a lesson where you’re talking at them, not interacting and talking at the same tone for everyone and making them all learn the same thing, i think you’ll find that only half of that class, if not less… will be engaged. Not blaming teachers, they are great for what they do and have my upmost respect. Where my problem lies isn’t with AI, if the system worked, students would be using AI to support them, not doing all the stuff for them, What fails is organisations like OFSTED which put so much stress and beurocracy onto teachers that it is hard for them to know what to keep up with, and when a student is depressed, they don’t know shit on how to deal with them, teachers are now expected to be marking or planning over weekends and holidays on top of their actual job which is stupid because they should be able to just teach, they got a uni degree why does a regulator/the government not see enough proof of progress in just knowing they’re extremely qualified, it should be up to head teachers, or the parents of pupils as to who is fired, not the government, These teachers are also councillors, therapists, intervention when bullying occurs due to those roles not being present enough in society for thousands of students to have one allocated to them, they need to be present at all times in the school, they literally can’t catch a break so adding all this regulatory nonsense likely makes their job a hellhole, add in difficult students and ai work, and yeah it’s just draining, I get why they leave entirely and blaming it on tech companies is totally valid, they contribute very poorly to the world and could help reshape the school system if they wanted to too, without doubts but limiting it to just them kind of ignores what the full picture actually is. government restrictions on them and failed structures to adhere to like ofsted only weaken the potential of the child, they make a system that only works for one kind of person, one who doesn’t have family struggle, is neurotypical and can easily pay attention when being talked at, rather than being talked to. What if someone was interested in Art and was the greatest artist at that school, getting consistently better with every painting or sculpture they make but cant really talk well, isn’t academically minded, and is consistently bullied because they’re put in classes that don’t utilise their strengths but have to go? Thats not a failure on that person if they decide to use something like AI to support them writing an essay or summarise what teachers are saying, it’s a failure on the system for not letting this student reach their full potential, by having a one size fits all rule. An interests based, personalised system would utilise their ability in art and focus learning perhaps other skills around that, maybe they’re into architecture and over a few years gain abilities in English and maths through their interest of art and slow and gradual building on the foundation of their interests, that way they can still have a good repertoire of knowledge for job applications, but isn’t failed by systemic tests that lead nowhere and is a much more enriched student than they would otherwise be.