Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's obvious that God versus AI is the final battle. Man's greatest strength is…
ytc_Ugyx0oKuf…
G
If you simply draw a stick figure, you're already better at art than every singl…
ytc_Ugz554RHA…
G
Actually I don't really get why AI is a big problem. It is going to learn any wa…
ytc_UgxolGxS0…
G
ChatGPT does the same thing with medical literature. ChatGPT will fabricate medi…
ytc_Ugxqu8QHU…
G
Yeah bro I empathize with you, initially I was on the other side and very indiff…
ytc_UgzW947y2…
G
WE ARRE COOKED WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS THEY ARE SO DUM MAKING SOMETHING THEY KNO…
ytc_Ugw9AJ-L-…
G
Really Angry Seagull what's the point of a self driving car if you can't take yo…
ytr_UgxhMlnyT…
G
This was so incredibly informative. We need more journalists with a technical ba…
ytc_UgzZLU8gF…
Comment
I fully understand the concept of training bias and the importance of being aware of it and avoiding it. However, one should not assume that, since the human resume reviewers, and then the AI, tended to pick men at a greater rate than women, that this represents a bias problem. Whatever those characteristics (other than gender specifically) were, they may have, indeed, selected the ideal candidates in the vast majority of cases. Those humans, and AIs, may have picked the most successful candidate again and again. So, if you reject the result, just because women are selected at a lower a random population might suggest, you could be settling for a sub-optimal process instead. In fact, if you're not careful, you could continually tweak your process until you get to the point that you are semi-consciously introducing bias FOR women by rejecting any solution that doesn't select them at a proportionate rate.
youtube
AI Bias
2021-09-17T00:0…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwDW3MEKUQRg5cYVQt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugws_d2Y-7hbfgM5h_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBj0WUHpEKWZTnKB14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyujJa0atwPZIGzyap4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyz7L92AER4HUs36ol4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJm5cmf8UQXUUVjWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAuySIDzFI1lyx2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkPjlTScz2Yn_XgQd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMBK_LdH17XO8Qaah4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzs4fUmt_E3je34Pf14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]