Raw LLM Responses

If that guy did post an AI image as a comparison before that post then no, you and everybody he's criticizing ARE lying Just because you can't differentiate emotions by facial expression doesn't mean he should have to be hyper specific with clarification if he HAD shared an AI comparison, that doesn't mean that the current example IS one and does not mean it is "IMPLIED" because you think it is "There are many art styles that are more complex and detailed than Ghibli's that do not go all the way to the A.I. image example I gave" KEYWORD: GAVE If he had previously posted such a thing then it's not his fault that his post was MISINTERPRETED, not that he "IMPLIED" anything, but rather didn't adequately clarify something you wish he had Why the fuck are illustrative artists the most annoying types? People "calling him out" On fucking what? Something they made up? I have never seen more annoying and objectively incorrect people outside of a Trump rally So insane you can see him argue the same point I did, which you could, if you care so much to insult him, counter and prove wrong by showing whatever example actually WAS posted or showing that no such post existed at all and that's he's outright lying (oh, you did, and whatya know? It's an obvious AI example! Crazy!) There's also no room for an argument of "well, if somebody barely read his post or misinterpreted he should have taken that possibility into account and stated things more clearly" Ridiculous