Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
the sad irony is Ai allow everyone to share their dreams.. only corporations and…
ytr_Ugz-k2OUM…
G
If this was a real robot, I'm assuming it has special sensors in the mid body an…
ytc_UgxWdxpxG…
G
looks like the AI art was a great thing for the post
cuz we discovered a lot of …
ytc_UgwzKHjaN…
G
05:28 Copyright law settles content copying
05:50 Creators fearful of AI stealin…
ytc_UgwKKNJHq…
G
If you rely completely on AI to do your work, you won’t actually learn anything.…
ytc_UgxfFgnct…
G
1:20:20 We didn’t restrain use of nuclear weapons until we had already used them…
ytc_UgyFLN55a…
G
This discussion has been so eye opening to what and who but not how to fight ag…
ytc_UgwzXJpSX…
G
Remember how annoyed people get when fielded through a series of "press 1 for x,…
ytc_UgwLU-Xpl…
Comment
While was kinda impressive the AI calling out some of the fallacies, that's about it, to me, the AI still lost the discussion
It contradict itself with its own answers, some of its answers refute it's past answers and later answers, and a lot of them were very shallow, it was simply "regardless of what you say, I still think it's a hotdog" and "I will still call it it's own thing", it's straight up stubbornness
I do know he asked the AI the opposite what he says, but it doesn't make the arguments any good, I wasn't expecting the AI to say it lost the debate, but seriously, the arguments are way too shallow, if it was a real person and not an AI I know that was told to disagree, I would simply not talk with someone like that again, there are people like that, that like to be contrarians, and talking to a wall seems to be less of a waste of time than talking with someone like that
I simply expected a bit more from the argumentung skills of the AI or hoped for it to not contradict itself, but like always, AI continues being stupid
youtube
2026-02-08T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugzc61wt73fG6R3ujk54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTsUjORpwqZl2NAs94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgzCcHOTApA_R1i5-Up4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_Ugwlb_MZLZWPuSKe-ip4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugxl5xUrwSweWst7DHZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgwNaPQACkVx3rxzoBB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgxzNd3FUL9_f842wBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzSW9BxAeWM6eFPa0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgwQN9VXwD0mkpdcj6l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugz7VatROY9hRnKkXkN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})