Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G ​@OhAwehow is it different from elected crooked official who don't want to leave… ytr_Ugyi9260B… G We don't know if he's right about that though. It's also possible that the soci… rdc_ohtj97w G Food, farming, manufacturing, health sector, agriculture will never go out of st… ytc_UgwlBnHZL… G What this video misses is that Angel Engine is AI art in every sense of the term… ytc_UgxHKr6ox… G Anyone who believes in self-driving cars that are supposed to be on our roads mu… ytc_UgzQV_VwR… G I built some of the first chat bots in the late 1990's. That was just simple cod… ytc_UgzNc9ilj… G im glad there isnt self driving carsi wont buy one this is the reason i didnt in… ytc_UgyvpT0MY… G Regardless of your opinion on AI art, any attempt to poison an AI model with bad… ytc_UgyDDnX97…
Comment
Regulations sound good in theory, but the authors of this video overlook one crucial point: a lot of today’s AI regulation is written by people who don’t actually understand the technology, and that kind of intervention tends to stall growth rather than guide it. In areas like AI-driven hiring, the market will inevitably self-correct anyway. Employers will eventually realise that AI-filtered candidates are often just people who are good at gaming AI systems, not necessarily people who are good at the job. If we don’t fully understand how AI works, how can we design regulations that genuinely solve the issues? My concern is that places like California may end up regulating so aggressively that the development simply moves elsewhere — not necessarily to China, just to any region that chooses a lighter approach. I’m not saying AI should be left completely unregulated, but assuming that regulation automatically fixes problems is naïve.
youtube 2025-12-04T07:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgyQEeKcGWLFTvEZWXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzfWJUolcpM82SA5QB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwkqB3QWHHqBE8diHF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyvby1s8IZT3Q1L_Gh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzoDg-VihVSAoPl7814AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyCNL4V4kZLTyfADsN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwCEbQdNoJJIGulU0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyt5S_WePTUAbbuNO14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyVrSvXpH69ofDySfV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwQVlI_JDbDQZlNpK94AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]