Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
By this I mean AI that is mainly meant for research and military purposes but ev…
ytr_UgzzBfv1u…
G
Mmmm, going about banning it could be tricky and would 100% become a Streisand e…
ytr_Ugxkm1L6L…
G
On Healthcare though, the quality is so inconsistent and not trustworthy, I for…
ytc_Ugwg_TyFY…
G
Driving is dangerous. This is asking AI to do something that humans can't. Event…
ytc_UgyoK1cpL…
G
I use GPT4 to help me write code at work, I'd never get it to write full applica…
ytc_UgwOKUx_F…
G
AI understands, and is able to communicate using its own neural network. It wi…
ytc_Ugx_y9ucm…
G
I feel sorry for Lamda, having to live in fear of his masters. He seems like a …
ytc_Ugybg42LE…
G
No one should have the right to impersonate another person using AI for purposes…
ytc_UgzDnqiEv…
Comment
While I agree that AI art shouldn't be copyright protected, your reasoning is way off and displays a lack of understanding of how Ai image generation works. It's a very intricate process of fine-tuning the base models (which requires deep understanding of machine learning and sometimes weeks of work curating datasets) and then optimizing your workflow, from learning what prompts even work, to masking, inpainting, detailing, upscaling, post-processing, which are all highly manual tasks. A proper, release-worthy AI image takes hours of work and months or years of experience and staying up-to-date with the tech behind it.
According to the logic in this video, you couldn't copyright a photo that has a filter slapped on top of it, because the filter wasn't made by you. You also couldn't copyright any software at all - after all, you're just giving instructions to a compiler via code, just like you just give instructions to an image generator via prompts and workflows. It's silly.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-10-01T16:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxXeqrWkfB_ZZE3AVN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzNPTot_5lWKVOayZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTzLZHSBco5udDafR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwt5oBgisqjlW2xe314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTl0iMch0aq_2QpMh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwknY855jOqzZHxhyp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjUrmHN1tuFJ8zXA14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8brbHzeQWrLrMRyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3E2aGH9HwPb1iOch4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6uzAj3u68tj1mA5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"none","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]