Raw LLM Responses

Its not even the inaccuracies on their own, because yes, human artist fuck up and we still like it. If the only defense we have against AI art is it isn't good yet then its not really a protection at all. But these MFers take such ownership on a creation they divorced themselves from the process of actually learning HOW to create, or what references it likely used... and there's OBVIOUS problems... You made this shit 20 time faster than THE BEST artist... and you can't take the time to fix it... like I'm pretty sure there are options IN PROGRAM to rerender individual parts, this is probably the best result you got out of 30 (if you didn't just post the whole lot as its own repetitive redundant gallery)… just... like the time to beat is roughly 6 hours for a highly rendered thirst trap, USE THAT TIME... But they don't know how too. The problem with all AI, from images, to writing, to coding, is that if you aren't already an expert, how the fuck are you supposed to curate what comes out of it. Its just like the goddamn Teslas, a trained driver STILL needs to be behind that wheel, AND that driver needs to be aware of what the car is doing and not implicitly trust it, which is harder to do than just driving your damn self, not to mention boring. If being an artist turns into waiting by the oven, checking if its done, and occasionally stirring, then I don't want to be an artist,