Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
you're right.
but
I hate the fact that you don't take into consideration that s…
ytc_UgwE2yvBk…
G
It's unfair if human beings could kill everything except themselves. AI is the b…
ytc_UgzZMYntn…
G
Human children don't do as they are told, at first. It takes 15-20 years to turn…
ytc_Ugy9ab7Ur…
G
The customer service AI sounded like a bored 30 white girl doing manicure 💅 whil…
ytc_Ugw2ouecJ…
G
Regarding the comment about people who think humans should die and be overtaken …
ytc_UgzjEaO7S…
G
Propaganda. It isn't AI. Graduating with a degree means u usually have no skil…
ytc_Ugxp4giRe…
G
Whats sad is this technology being discussed is quite possibly thee single most …
ytc_UgyLhbvQA…
G
I have a basic understanding of Ai and machine learning. Is the issue that it's …
ytc_Ugz89zZh1…
Comment
See, this video is really disappointing to me.
Not the content itself, but rather because of the thesis of the video: that AI is theft.
This YouTuber has shown that they can clearly be nuanced, as with their Apollo 13 video, but the fact that they have shown that they're capable and willing to alter their standards simply because of the subject matter's emotional weight is... concerning.
It also seems like despite the research done to make this video, the thesis remained unchanged. What I'm saying is that this YouTuber made a thesis first (which is common) before looking at the evidence. Then, they looked for claims and parts of truth that supported their thesis, instead of making a thesis *after* looking at the evidence.
TL;DR
Great potential, disappointing execution
EDIT:
I really should've mentioned the personal attacks in this video as well, but I mean, you don't even have to look for them. Just watch maybe 10, 20 minutes, and you'll hear at least one. I'm sure Shadiversity also had at least one in his video, but the fact that ad hominems in this video is a bad sign.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-01-15T02:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwgLs3ngNT6pYTNRy94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disappointment"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQCXW8lF8UQH-z2xh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUAjwE0qz_SHSVcsR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwh1NpQpKqlGORFchh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwufCHNwlt8DzTvTwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynK_U2ASy-YJbCsm54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVeDtVaDyH7ggsVgJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSMXq4C8uyrIEV7GN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRtJpihDB7KDxEg6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeT04zGIuwbye7BqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]