Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Do you see the robot looking in the camera why does he looking in camera he is s… ytc_UgwP81zhA… G The end goal is probably for AI to be the average worker so bosses don't have to… ytc_UgzD86uMS… G IDK DARPA and others have some ne t gen stuff we have Noidea about. There's a r… ytr_UgwSIdFwz… G AI will never have actual emotions it reacts based on the knowledge it has on hu… ytc_Ugy-WR3LT… G Can anyone explain why he thinks we’re close to AGI? LLMs are far away from that… ytc_UgzyQrLss… G Question: RETURNS... How will Amazon Automate Returns? - All the talk is about o… ytc_UgzPYh7-1… G Watching this video and receiving an ad for Claude where the person is saying ho… ytc_Ugx6yomIc… G It minimizes coding time and write unit tests based on the context of files you … rdc_jprdi0h

Comment

See, this video is really disappointing to me. Not the content itself, but rather because of the thesis of the video: that AI is theft. This YouTuber has shown that they can clearly be nuanced, as with their Apollo 13 video, but the fact that they have shown that they're capable and willing to alter their standards simply because of the subject matter's emotional weight is... concerning. It also seems like despite the research done to make this video, the thesis remained unchanged. What I'm saying is that this YouTuber made a thesis first (which is common) before looking at the evidence. Then, they looked for claims and parts of truth that supported their thesis, instead of making a thesis *after* looking at the evidence. TL;DR Great potential, disappointing execution EDIT: I really should've mentioned the personal attacks in this video as well, but I mean, you don't even have to look for them. Just watch maybe 10, 20 minutes, and you'll hear at least one. I'm sure Shadiversity also had at least one in his video, but the fact that ad hominems in this video is a bad sign.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2026-01-15T02:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	developer
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	unclear
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgwgLs3ngNT6pYTNRy94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disappointment"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQCXW8lF8UQH-z2xh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUAjwE0qz_SHSVcsR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwh1NpQpKqlGORFchh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwufCHNwlt8DzTvTwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynK_U2ASy-YJbCsm54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVeDtVaDyH7ggsVgJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSMXq4C8uyrIEV7GN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRtJpihDB7KDxEg6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeT04zGIuwbye7BqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses