Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I can’t wait for AI to replace lawyers. MF’ers charging me £1,500 for a two para…
rdc_mbztr9p
G
These tools are not that bad per se (Opus better than the other IMHO), BUT you m…
ytc_UgzAdw1Sm…
G
I am an honors student. Never used AI to do my assignments, but I have seen so m…
ytc_Ugyvk1w16…
G
@vrillionaire88yes that was a joke...you must be fun at parties or are you on a…
ytr_Ugz7CwUK-…
G
On the Blue collar side of things, the food service industry will be the first t…
ytr_Ugy3yxT8r…
G
People are protect ai like theid life depents on it , guys don"t worry Allied Ma…
ytc_UgyGhf_Eg…
G
I don't use AI but I heard some pretty bad stuff about Grok, so it surprises me …
ytc_Ugwfthg1E…
G
Don't AI art programs cost money? Not sure but I've never seen any free ones.
M…
ytr_UgyplD0As…
Comment
What Yampolskiy is doing here isn’t new — it’s part of a very old media pattern. Fear-based narratives always generate reach, and platforms reward exactly this dynamic. The more extreme the prediction, the higher the engagement. It’s not about truth; it’s about amplification.
Interviews with catastrophists almost always go viral because fear is a reliable attention engine. Hosts benefit from boosted view counts, guests benefit from publicity, and the entire system rewards emotional extremity over balanced analysis. It’s not a conspiracy — it’s just how the attention economy works.
This is why these conversations often sound more like metaphysics dressed as engineering. The emotional certainty, the doomsday tone, the “I know something others don’t” framing — these are classic storytelling techniques for capturing attention, not scientific argumentation. The risks of AI are real, but turning speculative scenarios into guaranteed disasters is a business model, not a research methodology.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-11-27T11:4…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy56i3yCvIS1H-iQeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1tWrtiZh4KkuVGtZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEOJkDfdoFKcdAyGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfqBlH55FsMXp08YN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZWrR4HhsShzB4iFd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ0lKO7zFNfw7ArY54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybKGti21A2jgR423R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5AFYoHo6He3wwdlZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuAEPdg1iTmQYX45p4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQyI4PKDnhc11i59N4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]