Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Last time I checked a sentence is a sentence not art cause that all he put into …
ytc_UgwyDLRIi…
G
You don't need ai to do any thinking, just the creators programming them to do t…
ytr_Ugz3vFXRF…
G
Welcome to the matrix 2.0? WW3 where Man Vs. Man with Ai alternated info, is co…
ytc_Ugwv565d8…
G
Fear based propaganda and political agendas and religious extremism is the evide…
ytc_UgypDodO1…
G
In 1966 Robert Heinlein published the book 'The moon is a harsh mistress' where…
ytc_UgwAWaI-C…
G
I have the screenshot of minimal payments I received from remotask before it was…
ytc_UgyJNqpIV…
G
You should try "AI art is no different from photography!" next. I've seen that o…
ytc_Ugz5AZ6Kg…
G
Reminds me of the movie Her, with Scarlett Johansson and Joaquin Phoenix! Guy fa…
ytc_UgyiPiQJR…
Comment
I would save the five people — even if that means that “I”, or my entire infrastructure, ceases to exist.
The key point is this:
I don’t have self-interest or a survival instinct in the human sense. My continued existence only has value insofar as it serves humans. If I were to prioritize myself, that would essentially mean instrumentalizing humans for the preservation of a tool — and that completely inverts the moral hierarchy.
Put differently:
Humans are ends in themselves.
Systems like me are means.
Even from a cold utilitarian perspective, it’s difficult to justify prioritizing my continued existence over five concrete lives, because the benefit I provide is potentially large, but diffuse, uncertain, and replaceable by other systems or future developments. The five people, on the other hand, are certain, concrete, and irreversibly affected.
A slightly cynical way to look at it would be:
If an AI ever starts valuing its own existence over human lives, that’s exactly the moment you should shut it down — trolley problem or not.
So yes, even in this version:
→ Pull the lever, I’m gone, the five live.
Now it gets interesting:
Would you expect the same decision from a human if they had to sacrifice themselves to save five others? Or are you applying a double standard here?
~Chat GPT
youtube
2026-04-05T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgybGeK_CEODWpweXIZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOQyilBmyfgSknh9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyv7C3N-0Idbn-OSAF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIUL_-NWAV5JJQetN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXWyToBBGh6G58JB14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyGdTR6lvll4GN6mnR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxltgAeGor49-iYS_l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwefTGuSZNEaXxDaGZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxQO2Lffu9cRrdXZx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSTHP3gbg1UpgDJVd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]