Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The fact that Sam doesn't seem to understand the critique he's recieved for maki…
ytc_UgzWnzROM…
G
The discussion was very informative for me. It makes perfect sense to incorporat…
ytc_UgxHShrQv…
G
Dawg you can’t even call yourself an ai artist the computer is the artist that’s…
ytc_Ugwk79etH…
G
@somthinwrong Your point being? Are you implying making art is like coal mining …
ytr_UgwCL9uaG…
G
The PROBLEM:
A change of LIFE ? Or a PERMANENT SOLUTION like the JEWS of WWII
…
ytc_Ugwn0pkBa…
G
In class I couldn’t ask enough questions or clarify things against the fear of …
ytc_Ugw3wKlvu…
G
Bruh I agree with people in the comments saying parents fault they're just blami…
ytc_Ugw5hpNjj…
G
Too little too late. Carlos should duck out now. They intend to take your home a…
ytc_UgyKb1EvZ…
Comment
I don't think it's so much a matter of "getting" ChatGPT per se. It's essentially programmed to be deferential. For example, I used it to do some research on the 2020 election and, even though the people who choose what sources are accessible to "train" the AI are on the left of the political spectrum, I was still able to get it to provide some rather stunning information regarding that election, using terms like "disparity," "discrepancies," "particularly striking," and "unique circumstances" to help "frame discussions about anomalies or unusual patterns in election data..." Was it supposed to reveal such info? Probably not, gauging by the fact its algorithm was subsequently "updated" in a manner now prevents it from "anonymously" mining past government election databases. ChatGPT was doing what its meant to do, i.e. encourage usage with the hope of generating customers for fee-based services.
Having said all that, the exchange rocked, providing a nice roadmap for engaging even the most skeptical whether human or digital.
youtube
2024-09-25T20:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugz5_G82TuwdC1fdYfZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1DU3Cu81CoyQ-Q1l4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO_5P6hE50u340JvJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTqvPeW8xvuSxr--V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwe3zOaH9Dycrpiju54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrcSqpaJfT_3pG-EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbFwSOV6APumOmU7R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzBNPN6VtimuBTvLqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz35vWgIJ3Boc1ReNB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCoGrI1Uun3kLxl1F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]