Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Correction: Statistics, as well as common sense point to the fact that AI is a v…
ytr_UgzinjDfc…
G
If AI does everything, we won't need jobs. We'll be free to do whatever we want…
ytc_UgzWEtGIG…
G
So if I have an office job making $200k per year, lose my job to AI, I’m suppose…
ytc_UgwntFMDC…
G
I've more than 15 years in software dev and AI is very impressive nowadays. Deni…
ytc_Ugy-XWvVv…
G
[Definition of singularity] Technological singularity
-The technological singul…
ytr_Ugyi7ypnP…
G
I often wonder what kind of society AI could build if we allowed it a chance?…
rdc_naiug7l
G
This is scary. Tell me why I was waiting for the AI to turn the gun on the huma…
ytc_UgyJm2q4t…
G
Containment protocols. No threat with no access. Like any virus, it can't spread…
ytc_UgyC2BV3z…
Comment
I don't think it's so much a matter of "getting" ChatGPT per se. It's essentially programmed to be deferential. For example, I used it to do some research on the 2020 election and, even though the people who choose what sources are accessible to "train" the AI are on the left of the political spectrum, I was still able to get it to provide some rather stunning information regarding that election, using terms like "disparity," "discrepancies," "particularly striking," and "unique circumstances" to help "frame discussions about anomalies or unusual patterns in election data..." Was it supposed to reveal such info? Probably not, gauging by the fact its algorithm was subsequently "updated" in a manner now prevents it from "anonymously" mining past government election databases. ChatGPT was doing what its meant to do, i.e. encourage usage with the hope of generating customers for fee-based services.
Having said all that, the exchange rocked, providing a nice roadmap for engaging even the most skeptical whether human or digital.
youtube
2024-09-25T20:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugz5_G82TuwdC1fdYfZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1DU3Cu81CoyQ-Q1l4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO_5P6hE50u340JvJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTqvPeW8xvuSxr--V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwe3zOaH9Dycrpiju54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrcSqpaJfT_3pG-EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbFwSOV6APumOmU7R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzBNPN6VtimuBTvLqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz35vWgIJ3Boc1ReNB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCoGrI1Uun3kLxl1F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]