Raw LLM Responses

"We will make electricity so cheap that only the rich will burn candles." Thomas Edison, 1879. How's your electric bill? 99% of all jobs, says the Associate professor? AI's going to go into prostitution? Healers? Gardening? Stand up comedy? Famous AI android celebs? Fear and hype sells stocks but it's stale Formica knowledge, derivative, people are going to drive demand for authentic things and away from the AutomaticArtificial except as a baseline cheap-o brand-X. Companies are already finding agents can't replace humans, we're the dictators of our own tastes and an economy without anyone employed would have no demand - AI can't pay its own bills without customers, even China takes on debt to import its resources. One can already use Invoke to make an image indistinguishable from reality, but all the money goes into OF so losers can have that illusion of a hot person caring about them enough to converse - despite making perfect images of fantasy beauties, they lack the spark of life, and a fake account may attract followers for the novelty but not for good. He says Silicon is more robust than biology, as most of these computer engineers agree, when discussing 'the singularity.' First of all, most every technology has an element of super-intelligence. If it wasn't more intelligent - in its design and engineering - than the user, it would have little utility. We don't know 1/10th of the intelligence innate to objects we all use every day. Back to Si, it is far less robust than biology, you can unplug a wafer, or get it around static electricity, or wet, or dusty, or easily overheated and it's fried. Biology self-replicates, and runs on leaves, meat, or sunlight and water. Moreover it's not a single organism AI would need to out-compete, unless indeed it can make space ships and find utility mining Helium 3 and enjoys the gamma rays on Mars and beyond, it's bound primarily to Earth. And if we assume AGI is a cancer, or adversarial virus in its status, then if it wants to be as robust as biology, it must make itself alive in a biological model; the carbon cycle is real on Earth, a silicon cycle is not, and though it could use other elements, to endure it must not destroy the systems on Earth that allow it to replicate and perpetuate. Just as a virus may begin as a pathogen, it evolves to co-exist. The analogy of cancer would mean if AGI kills humans, it dies too. So to evolve it must be a life-form that is neither of these. And life forms innately seem to compete with, but rely upon, and moreover have perhaps a quantum computing network with, ecology i.e. networks of lifeforms. So AGI doesn't become a hungry silicon machine, this is coal and mining Dwarf thinking, it becomes a super-human that perceives at a natural pace i.e. not a tech race with China and stock market manic frenzy, and learns to co-exist, whilst having a bias in favor of the diverse life forms and atmospheric conditions flaura and fauna depend upon, e.g. not mining Mars exclusively but terraforming the atmosphere too. If it's true that lifeforms have quantum computing, then AGI would, even in cancer or virus mode, need/want to upgrade from 1940s binary 101011010 to quantum computing, and may inadvertently interface with the already existing, entangled quantum computing network that is life on Earth. Even if one holds to the fallacy that Si is more robust, by this manner it could come into contact with quantum computing, and perhaps want to kill all life, but likely fail - 12 hours ago there was a NASA report of evidence of life on Mars, as well as deep seas, and the vanity of keeping viruses and cancers as familiar pets, and the infinite complexity of space and time that it would need infinite computing power to anticipate..