Raw LLM Responses

The more I think about it, the more I doubt it. Our protest will not eliminate AI, it will only make it less accessible, controlled, taxed, and therefore more expensive. It will be used by those who can afford it, stronger entities, large studios and corporations that will train their own, closed and inaccessible models. Thanks to this, the great ones will become even bigger and stronger, and their advantage over independent creators will increase even more. If the copyright conversation turns to protecting not only the work but also the style, it will be even worse. Will our protests involuntarily lead to such a situation? I fear that when the smoke clears and new laws are passed, it will turn out that artists will not benefit from them, that art will become more limited, that closed AI models will lead to the monopolization of the market and entire styles by big companies. I'm afraid we're being used. Not only by AI. AI available to everyone, cheap or even free, changes everything, not always for the better, agreed, and at the same time it is a tool with great potential to level the playing field, democratize access to art, opening up previously unavailable opportunities for many, just as previous technological leaps allowed for art new people. And yes, it changes the current paradigm. The traditional values ​​of art - the artist's work, years of perfecting his skills, effort, the uniqueness of the artist, relying on his own skills honed over the years - were our only reality until yesterday. Since advent, AI has become... an option to choose from. An optional option. We've never been in a situation like this before. Is a return to the status quo from a few months ago possible? Yes. Yes, but only if it is forced - through changes in the law, social pressure, intimidation and humiliation of people who are already using image generators, closing the gates again - some of these things are already happening...