Raw LLM Responses

1:00 "without the consent of the intellectual property owners" But they don't need your consent. They aren't distributing your artwork. You say it's a violation of your rights, but it isn't. There is no established right you have to the use of your work for the process of training a human or an AI. Also, it's not illegal. If it is, cite the law it violates, please. 3:47 So I guess we should ban Fiverr artists too then. You can hire someone on Fiverr to make something like other artists. Even similar voices and music styles. Sorry bud but you don't own copyright on a style. And if you're concerned it might result in someone making forgeries or whatever else, I can hire someone on Fiverr to do the same thing. I don't need an AI to be an asshole. If you don't want your art to be scraped from the internet and used, don't upload it to the internet. Your work is NOT being used for commercial purposes. It doesn't matter if the AI can create a perfect replica or not. It's completely irrelevant to whether or not what they do is legal or not. Even if like you said "a person studying your art is not the same as an AI". Okay. I don't give a shit. Even if it's COMPLETELY different, that in no way justified claiming rights to the art from being used in the training data process. Again, your art....is not...being distributed. Period. The reason there's a double standard with music is because the music industry has a stranglehold over the internet. They have far more money and organization than digital art and artists. They are scarier. But I would contend it's still not illegal for AI to do what they're doing with music.