Raw LLM Responses

If you have the possibility to go with senators in the USA or hire lawyers, here is the gray area: (ai lawyers are saying that the output "art" is completely different and not competing with original art, this last is completely false! Output Ai "art" is competing directly with original art and in same market, wich means, artists will be harmed much in earnings and will lose their jobs by trying to compete against very massive ai "art". The four factor on fair use prohibits this. So, this is not fair use! Therefore is illegal! Four factor on fair use: The Effect of the Use Upon the Potential Market Another important fair use factor is whether your use deprives the copyright owner of income or undermines a new or potential market for the copyrighted work. Depriving a copyright owner of income is very likely to trigger a lawsuit. This is true even if you are not competing directly with the original work. For example, in one case an artist used a copyrighted photograph without permission as the basis for wood sculptures, copying all elements of the photo. The artist earned several hundred thousand dollars selling the sculptures. When the photographer sued, the artist claimed his sculptures were a fair use because the photographer would never have considered making sculptures. The court disagreed, stating that it did not matter whether the photographer had considered making sculptures; what mattered was that a potential market for sculptures of the photograph existed. (Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992).)