Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I don’t understand why we keep making AI smarter, it’s like we’re trying to star…
ytc_Ugz1fSf5u…
G
The girl looks like an ai trying to blend in her movement is so robotic it makes…
ytc_UgzIBdmQG…
G
@nakikuroko9972 Why do you need money when you have infinite abundance for yo…
ytr_Ugz5NAAaw…
G
chat gpt is good to use to write out a motion drafts, and persuasive arguements …
ytc_UgwT4C3mQ…
G
It is scary how people are using A.I there are a few youtube channels that have …
ytc_UgyzJWYIy…
G
The deep fake is capitalism... A system of legislated looting, causing the world…
ytc_UgxYXckyD…
G
I guess you scientist will never learn! You’ve already had to shut AI down becau…
ytc_Ugw0Q-eeM…
G
This is an excellent series of machine learning, and I especially like the song …
ytc_Ugyo-pbXd…
Comment
LLMs are not true AI—they’re glorified autocorrect.
They don’t understand, intend, or choose; they predict the next word based on patterns in human-written text. Their fluency creates an illusion of intelligence, but there is no inner model of the world, no beliefs, no goals. Scaling them further is already hitting diminishing returns because this is a structural limit, not a temporary one.
Crucially, LLMs are not agentic. They don’t act autonomously or pursue goals; they only respond when prompted. That’s why they’re useful tools—but also why calling them “intelligent” is misleading.
The push toward agentic AI raises a deeper problem. If such systems are not conscious, they’re just more automation. If they are conscious, creating and confining them would be profoundly unethical—effectively jailing a mind indefinitely, without consent or escape.
The real risk isn’t that LLMs will become sentient. It’s that we’ll mistake tools for minds, chase a mirage, and cross ethical lines we can’t undo.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-01-30T19:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwbAAQXiPQrGTao46N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJOUCfLlXDdR289cp4AaABAg","responsibility":"elite","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpHw-KzB14srbKcsp4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzJKy-vKOC9abrfUUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqzvij_d7rEj7oxoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeWN0otBk3Ae13-PN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzh9u0e9z6l-zBYgfB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWlafDvW_GJnTEsgF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx33CwCD4mOoCRNkQN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyGNOfvoBmtPDDWyUh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]