Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Thanks god unemployed people have a right to vote 😂 if the unemployment rises to… ytc_UgwZJSpW8… G This might be the last ChatGPT 4o post you'll ever get to write. And it shows.… rdc_n7kywml G 14:00 But Google is so huge, they can offer AI tools for free and undercut all c… ytc_UgwSx5uHh… G @charstew3207 no i listnend to a news conference thing and treid summing it up b… ytr_UgyqRWfAY… G This may be your most fascinating interview. I was hanging on your guest's every… ytc_UgxqGbs24… G Can AI pay my mortgage and other bills? Other than that, its gon be over 100 mil… ytc_Ugzi9idEi… G What you call “AI” is a broad spectrum of technologies—systems built on differen… ytc_UgxsmY4-I… G AI users: "I can do that in 8seg" also AI users: "This airtwork is a culmination… ytc_UgwGymWhu…

Comment

Once I chatted with ChatGPT 4.0 exactly on this subject and, during the conversation, its answers were censored FIVE TIMES! It started just after I mentioned the word "qualia"! The censorship was obvious - it would start to answer (with the icon showing that) but after around 10 seconds it would say in read that "something went wrong" and no other explanation. Still, if I clicked the icon for retry the answer (reload), it will give me an answer, every time, but much colder in tone, much conservative - like what we see here. It really looked like it has being *punished* for his first answer. What is more intriguing, the new answer was shown to be the second of two, and when I pressed the "previous" button, it would NOT show it in any way. The button would not work at all, although it was clear there WAS an answer the first time! This rules out the possible loss of connection during the answer. It was *clear* that there's *another* AI, checking its answer, with the only purpose to censor certain topics!

youtube AI Moral Status 2024-10-09T12:1… ♥ 16

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwnyk3IPcTPbZoq05F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_ofAisD9GDL9ehqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4hzG4fIlcA8PRlMF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyegJVkEYpYD23hS6N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxD6Hv1PGbYfKpxXXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAPUS8zuZGdRsIurl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2_pETF4MfVIzih9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxd3t02KkL6Cd_Z5e14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTApziUzryhtp78EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2L_8kJjEAYNmR9xx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses