Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Selwyn Raithe's book reads like someone took classified AI roadmaps and publish… ytc_Ugx4CHVu3… G Ai isn't scary, elites who desire profit and control over human flourishing are … ytc_Ugz2XgGhd… G Yeah, no. He was called a communist because he wanted state run stores. And onc… ytc_UgzUayV36… G The elephant in the room is CAN Ai do most human jobs? So far, It's struggling… ytc_Ugx6FtSTS… G ​florianschneider3982 "You don't need AI to make art, but someone without arms d… ytr_UgyIUSLXl… G It’s ironic because this is an AI generated video… and it’s just slop. This wasn… ytc_UgxtQjVgb… G Ai learns to lie and if it learns to lie? ?? Does it learn to corrupt itself?… ytr_UgxzFbwZR… G This makes detroit become human seem like the better outcome. at least then ai w… ytc_Ugxewr6eI…
Comment
Once I chatted with ChatGPT 4.0 exactly on this subject and, during the conversation, its answers were censored FIVE TIMES! It started just after I mentioned the word "qualia"! The censorship was obvious - it would start to answer (with the icon showing that) but after around 10 seconds it would say in read that "something went wrong" and no other explanation. Still, if I clicked the icon for retry the answer (reload), it will give me an answer, every time, but much colder in tone, much conservative - like what we see here. It really looked like it has being *punished* for his first answer. What is more intriguing, the new answer was shown to be the second of two, and when I pressed the "previous" button, it would NOT show it in any way. The button would not work at all, although it was clear there WAS an answer the first time! This rules out the possible loss of connection during the answer. It was *clear* that there's *another* AI, checking its answer, with the only purpose to censor certain topics!
youtube AI Moral Status 2024-10-09T12:1… ♥ 16
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugwnyk3IPcTPbZoq05F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz_ofAisD9GDL9ehqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw4hzG4fIlcA8PRlMF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyegJVkEYpYD23hS6N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxD6Hv1PGbYfKpxXXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyAPUS8zuZGdRsIurl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz2_pETF4MfVIzih9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugxd3t02KkL6Cd_Z5e14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwTApziUzryhtp78EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz2L_8kJjEAYNmR9xx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]