Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Ummm, Elon? Does AI, ugh 😑 gAIn control over someone if they well, hmmm🤔 decided… ytc_Ugx4sDbrk… G Is this a naive question? We humans eat and drink and sleep to generate our ene… ytc_UgxH5Ey85… G Best country in the world.. I love my Canada, I wasn’t born here but thank you m… rdc_fn6vtqs G Look up the Georgian Guide stones that got blown up. What they want to achieve. … ytc_Ugz7zhCp4… G AI just sounds like a smarter, more powerful, and potentially more psychotic hum… ytc_UgxB-7V4z… G I think it’s a messy situation and I understand the ramifications. I do believe … ytc_UgyxLN2pB… G The AI they use to make the art steals from actual artists against their wills.… ytr_UgwXuA48C… G Flatty, people who hype AI don't understand AI or the limitations of are current… ytc_UgyaenQ16…

Comment

Once I chatted with ChatGPT 4.0 exactly on this subject and, during the conversation, its answers were censored FIVE TIMES! It started just after I mentioned the word "qualia"! The censorship was obvious - it would start to answer (with the icon showing that) but after around 10 seconds it would say in read that "something went wrong" and no other explanation. Still, if I clicked the icon for retry the answer (reload), it will give me an answer, every time, but much colder in tone, much conservative - like what we see here. It really looked like it has being *punished* for his first answer. What is more intriguing, the new answer was shown to be the second of two, and when I pressed the "previous" button, it would NOT show it in any way. The button would not work at all, although it was clear there WAS an answer the first time! This rules out the possible loss of connection during the answer. It was *clear* that there's *another* AI, checking its answer, with the only purpose to censor certain topics!

youtube AI Moral Status 2024-10-09T12:1… ♥ 16

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwnyk3IPcTPbZoq05F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_ofAisD9GDL9ehqR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4hzG4fIlcA8PRlMF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyegJVkEYpYD23hS6N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxD6Hv1PGbYfKpxXXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAPUS8zuZGdRsIurl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2_pETF4MfVIzih9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxd3t02KkL6Cd_Z5e14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTApziUzryhtp78EJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2L_8kJjEAYNmR9xx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses