Raw LLM Responses

I think the biggest issue with AI generated works is the way that it can recognize and reproduce patterns in a highly systematic and ACTUALLY perfect way. No human can do that ~ and that is why we have IP in the first place. Reproducing someone else's art to the point it may be mistaken for another's has to be intentional when done by humans. For AI however, it's simple and actually built into its system to do. It has no desire to intentionally differentiate itself as a human would. Also, AI can only produce art based off of an uploaded data set. Without artists/data feeding the machine, it would start to lose the look and feel of art, and we could begin to see that the AI has a preset # of "unique" pieces of "art" based off its algorithm (within a certain data set). That's again, not how human art works. I've noticed within chat GPT that written pieces of work have already become highly similar. It's decided based off its code what the "preferred" pattern of speech is for whatever prompt. I dont want to live in a world where AI has completely taken over art. That's gonna be a boring ass world. It's really less about IP imo, and more about the reality that AI simply doesn't actually know what art is. Heck, as indicated by this comment section ~ a lot of people, particularly programmers (shocker lol) dont know what it is either. Likely the people programming these AI don't either, and so their bias has affected how the code functions.