Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I feel like getting rid of the developers to bring in the Ai is like banning the…
ytc_UgyYCoOLR…
G
If you use AI to enhance or speed up actions or processes you have at least a so…
ytc_UgwaHKAJd…
G
The profits will not go up in the long term. If everyone can use AI, doing It do…
ytc_UgxPe6Ss9…
G
We need facial recognition and it will help with all the lawbreakers it does not…
ytc_UgzKfFGtE…
G
I was having argument with my Brother in law. He was saying that AI in the very …
ytc_Ugw6MvxvL…
G
this video accurately describes the bizarre variety of results from asking the A…
ytc_Ugw3AvTcn…
G
There was a fool on the table who said people are llm , that's so stupid.…
ytc_UgzBJtLTv…
G
Ai doesnt get rights, they arent human and cant feel emotion, the fact that 4 in…
ytc_UgwvBiuNK…
Comment
I have a hard time taking this guest seriously during the key "What jobs will exist" segment. Yes, AI is already doing imitation podcasts, driving automated cars, and teaching students. Nobody would debate that. It's even doing an okay job, and will get even better. Nobody who is paying attention would debate that. That does not mean there aren't still important human-to-human things it is not doing.
People who are really turning up the volume on these claims consistently downplay the psycho-social relevance of the human factor. AI may be equally or more efficient at any number of tasks, but it does not follow that society will experience a net cognitive, political, emotional, or mental health benefit.
So when he jumps to "understand, it's ridiculous," I understand his argument to be jumping the shark. It's an intellectual cop-out, and I kind of tune out. I want to hear someone discuss that area of the topic without dismissing it casually; otherwise, you just sound like a hype man.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T12:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0L9Tc92xQ2-hP9aF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQB441y53eJXu5bKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyawh26VC9yzHY1hnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuD9cHet0GPma_PSd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw--Ff8vFK_OYUHBBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3tymoIBU_uUMxuYZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS8Az_AQS1D5I9lDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjGkak5lrcWXk8YX94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ-sZE8mezkkZHtVR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzvIrXfvoRFJMJLHVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"}
]