Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
it's so disgusting how there are people out there who refuse to understand or do…
ytc_UgxA2qioU…
G
Sadly, I think the only way we are going to have any human jobs in 2030 and beyo…
ytc_Ugz3J3fgv…
G
He tried to use ai art as an infinite money glitch cos why waste hours or days d…
ytc_UgyWnJBnM…
G
shows how dumb sam altman really is just add a ty button that does nothing other…
ytc_UgwAdoOuK…
G
Makes me wonder… if AI gets sentient and chatgpt starts taking over all humanity…
ytc_UgxXjpbsq…
G
Haha, that's an interesting take! Sophia definitely has a unique perspective tha…
ytr_UgzQ5IY4U…
G
There’s something real in the idea that students are starting to rely too much o…
ytc_Ugzc1Eqb5…
G
Alpha fold was only successful because of the enormous amount of clean data scie…
ytc_UgzA7PO0_…
Comment
I have a hard time taking this guest seriously during the key "What jobs will exist" segment. Yes, AI is already doing imitation podcasts, driving automated cars, and teaching students. Nobody would debate that. It's even doing an okay job, and will get even better. Nobody who is paying attention would debate that. That does not mean there aren't still important human-to-human things it is not doing.
People who are really turning up the volume on these claims consistently downplay the psycho-social relevance of the human factor. AI may be equally or more efficient at any number of tasks, but it does not follow that society will experience a net cognitive, political, emotional, or mental health benefit.
So when he jumps to "understand, it's ridiculous," I understand his argument to be jumping the shark. It's an intellectual cop-out, and I kind of tune out. I want to hear someone discuss that area of the topic without dismissing it casually; otherwise, you just sound like a hype man.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T12:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0L9Tc92xQ2-hP9aF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQB441y53eJXu5bKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyawh26VC9yzHY1hnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuD9cHet0GPma_PSd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw--Ff8vFK_OYUHBBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3tymoIBU_uUMxuYZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS8Az_AQS1D5I9lDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjGkak5lrcWXk8YX94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ-sZE8mezkkZHtVR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzvIrXfvoRFJMJLHVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"}
]