Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I would rather go broke buying Charlie's art pieces from his college days than p…
ytc_UgyMuRQkx…
G
@laurentiuvladutmanea No clue what that has to do with anything. Maybe you shoul…
ytr_UgzaaqISU…
G
Automation is supposed empower workers to be more efficient, safe, and reliable.…
ytc_UgwCjQ_LV…
G
AI will un-live us all, give us more power and we'll fix it.
…
ytc_UgyqzP0mK…
G
O boy,..... a patch for a ai , this early. That works for 1, 0 model , but when…
ytc_UgwUsHrrP…
G
AI is a tool, his usefullness depend on how we use it, for what purpose and depe…
ytc_UgxOHTgby…
G
Angel engine is not good tho, nothing AI has made is "good"
And we're not losing…
ytc_Ugw0-Ac_z…
G
I've been confused how they think AI will make money from all the people whose j…
ytc_Ugydfmzj8…
Comment
I have a hard time taking this guest seriously during the key "What jobs will exist" segment. Yes, AI is already doing imitation podcasts, driving automated cars, and teaching students. Nobody would debate that. It's even doing an okay job, and will get even better. Nobody who is paying attention would debate that. That does not mean there aren't still important human-to-human things it is not doing.
People who are really turning up the volume on these claims consistently downplay the psycho-social relevance of the human factor. AI may be equally or more efficient at any number of tasks, but it does not follow that society will experience a net cognitive, political, emotional, or mental health benefit.
So when he jumps to "understand, it's ridiculous," I understand his argument to be jumping the shark. It's an intellectual cop-out, and I kind of tune out. I want to hear someone discuss that area of the topic without dismissing it casually; otherwise, you just sound like a hype man.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T12:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0L9Tc92xQ2-hP9aF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQB441y53eJXu5bKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyawh26VC9yzHY1hnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuD9cHet0GPma_PSd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw--Ff8vFK_OYUHBBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3tymoIBU_uUMxuYZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS8Az_AQS1D5I9lDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjGkak5lrcWXk8YX94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ-sZE8mezkkZHtVR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzvIrXfvoRFJMJLHVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"}
]