Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Who is this creepy guy with the hat, looks like a fake clown hosting an intellig…
ytc_UgzsKpqmH…
G
Ai shows a reflection of truth in our society, no matter how much we want to ign…
ytc_UgyAgbH84…
G
Eventually we will all be dead. Jobs replaced, environment destroyed, and only A…
ytc_UgykaJ-Zo…
G
Sorry but chatGPT did not kill your kid. It's harsh but that is the flat, plain…
ytc_UgzQt4cxF…
G
These are all LLMs, they are incapable in every way possible from showing, learn…
ytc_Ugzv-wa9A…
G
"SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING.
Or don't, I mean we have to worry about the economy…
rdc_hm8mkh6
G
@whodis4097Indie and AI are oxymorons, no AI is truly indie, they will always be…
ytr_UgwsQOCIa…
G
Keep in mind that most AI supporters are men. Their incorrect use of terms is a…
ytc_UgxI-nwW0…
Comment
Hmmmmm, as the wife of someone getting his doctorate in data science (statistics +) and I hear the explanations of his doctoral studies, research, projects and dissertatio, my understanding is that there is a "maybe" category, making it actually more complicated. That 4% is neither no, nor yes. Saying that the machine only correctly identifying negative results 95% of the time means that the machine must be automatically saying "if not 'no' then yes", really creates a huge problem and makes that study invalid. Also, the reason for the "maybe" changes the chance of it swinging one way or the other, so this is far more nuanced than this videos makes it seem. A test that doesn't account for a third option (ie undeterminable) is wildly invalid and over-simplified to the point that there should be a strong push to think about if it shouldn't be considered at all.
But I think the video is right that most people and doctors great it wrong. Because they are doctors, not math geeks.
youtube
2026-04-11T16:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1YBFXMDyrmvvejUF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPS1hPvyMyM0HYdBd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNgpsXVmL9Vbpk9uV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyP5fFMcQfwd1vCBbZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMyvm54nMlCWTg0ft4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrM96f9GKnUM-S8VZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwE2bYS54-Z-nz4iGF4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1X-LcwPD9zeHbNkZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwkw1dO0J-tSGZVJ3t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNn-7yMfBAW5nulcp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"}
]