Raw LLM Responses

What I think a lot of people don't realize but I've seen some people noticing is the "A.I. Art style" With one artist on a certain Mongolian Basket Weaving Forum even going out of his way to break down and replicate the style. A.I. Art is almost always trained on porn or pin-ups. A lot of these have stiff poses or poses geared specifically for titillation. So already, A.I. art is being limited by the very skill level that smut artists put out, similarly, a lot of these images are render monkied. You can have the trashiest line-art but you can make up for it with enough rendering, A.I. takes that into consideration. So through developments over time, A.I. is slowly generating it's own art-style that makes it easy to point out. It's a symptom of art, artists will generally stylize realism in efforts to ease certain aspects of drawing or an attempt to replicate another artists, only for that original goal to shift into being something their own—even the old masters had stylization in their art, albeit not to the extent we have now. A.I. art is hilariously enough going through the same effect. Which in a way: has protected artists because now A.I. besides the general mistakes, can be recognized from even a thumbnail just due to the "stylistic" choices it makes. The issue or concern to have is the replication of a style to supplant the original artist. For instance, trying to get an A.I. to design in Toriyama's style or Frank Frazetta's.