Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Personally I believe much will depend on how fast AI can make the jump to ASI, b…
ytc_UgwYIAXeK…
G
well, you can just spend more time on youtube commenting on everything, hopefull…
ytc_UgyIWHuo-…
G
When people talk about “AGI” coming in the near future, it tells me they are eit…
ytc_UgxHySjI2…
G
Within 25-50 years, about 95% of the entire worlds workforce- will become unempl…
ytc_Ugz41ozD4…
G
the error with Chinese room is that it's assuming the machine is algorithmically…
ytc_UggYW1x63…
G
I appreciate your perspective! The conversation around AI and its role in societ…
ytr_Ugzwp-Gph…
G
The first things to go are things that cannot be objectively measured or are ver…
rdc_l9v7qkb
G
So we can still choose to buy from places and services without AI/ robots right?…
ytc_UgyouOq8q…
Comment
This is a huge one, using midjourney, I actually created an image that was 99% similar to a copyrighted image but only caught it because I was familiar with the artwork. I posted on reddit and other users also typed the same prompt and got the same results. I confronted midjourney about it and they basically said the risk is on you, which is weird because it basically opens up users to being sued because they could easily not catch whether or not it was an image that already exists. Now in theory generations from ai are supposed to be super randomized and it should be almost astronomically rare to get something even remotely similar to an existing image unless you specifically used image weight and a "init" image or an uploaded image as a source. But the fact everyone got the same image with the same prompts showed there was an error from midjourneys ai algorithm. To me this is a huge scandal but is likely a rare scenario.
youtube
2025-02-10T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgxO3gEl_yAKQJ0wm3h4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6w4Ls4owV6yem43d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzh3MMkPHNem4OdoAB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1xowupxkZkTL-lvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqp_KlcT1Qkell0b94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLb0p9cQ-Sh1P0HLh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqLxPS5Pl20H9IWkx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQn3KsVtAq7wHZr5R4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQhB2gbuHezVKqiK14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxujuptEScHdRBHfGN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"})