Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This feels so hopeless when you trying your best drawing your soul and personali…
ytc_UgxCkJVFl…
G
It just pisses me off, because people don't care how many YEARS we've SPENT to h…
ytc_UgzOUXWap…
G
Current LLMs have an intrinsic limitation that is language itself. Language isn'…
ytc_Ugxs2lO24…
G
That is much much much more difficult for robots to do. They've been trying with…
ytr_UgzbA0zNX…
G
Dont believe this. Humans as a whole dont have the ability to build that quickly…
ytc_UgxollQSO…
G
I don’t know what’s worse… leveraging faulty and hallucination-prone “AI” for we…
ytc_Ugxyic7g_…
G
At least the driverless truck is trained! As a guard shack worker, they already …
ytc_Ugxi3O3f0…
G
i think udio does better with genres that are outside of the popular music cultu…
ytc_UgyStXTo4…
Comment
Total? Nah. The best way to look at is if your job is heavily dependent on a compute or remote clerical tasks then yes, if you dont adapt your job is at risk. Jobs that absolutely require human interaction, physical labor, in person people skills are harder to replace. Essentially blue collar, creatives, special trade industries such as health care and hospitality will be Fairly secure. Secretarial, taxes, data entry, remote services would be the most logical to go. Ai isn't going to replace the food industry, hospital workers, plumbers etc. Again, if your job can be done entirely on a computer than those are the jobs that are most likely to get consolidated or reduced and that makes the most logical sense. This type of industrial revolution is no different then every other undistrial revolution. You just have to ask yourself how you can personally benefit from it because the change isnt coming, its already here. You have to decide how to leverage it in your favor.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-11-24T13:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxQ6GNGmSGZnFXNQ1B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzY2c0R2J5qrXrRgd14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZhcRfpcx5W5PbsnZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPiMIxjmntP3YJFQ54AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjkOJtTwSEeMp3hDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwL4SmNlwdcDaBiJ6V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWzPVEm_99h296lV14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrL5OfuJNVrB7Uodp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3Xyb80py-T1fF2XZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyE1QFAeH0VD8UqCGh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]