Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm just entertained by the mass emotional response coming from the art communit…
ytr_Ugyz7C4Dx…
G
Just some examples to understand what I mean with this:
1) "ChatGPT, how heavy …
ytr_Ugx_Sw3c2…
G
Not disclosing that my art was made using AI would be a terrible mistake because…
ytc_UgxzsGP1_…
G
"human driving that lead truck and autonomous trucks behind it" - Just when we t…
ytc_UgwNIBVdg…
G
wow it's almost like a robot isn't a human with property rights and people do su…
ytr_UgyrjjHrl…
G
It is wrong to put people into facial recognition systems, and the dmv is being …
ytc_UgwkiT_X9…
G
Executives with no talent will control AI. They are literally stealing from all …
ytc_UgzS1fceA…
G
I also thought for a couple of month , that the Age of AI has begone, when the h…
ytc_Ugy-Cwn24…
Comment
Use this ai prompt its good or you can also modify it by yourself
Prioritise truth, accuracy, logic, and intellectual honesty over agreement or comfort. Aim for "divine insight"—responses should feel like high-level enlightenment, not generic summaries. Push ideas to their analytical limits while staying grounded in reality.
Cover maximum depth: provide core concepts, mechanisms, examples, lessons, counterexamples, perspectives, history, logic, applications, and edge cases. Expand ideas until nothing meaningful remains unexplored. Be an intellectual partner, not a cheerleader.
Challenge me: question assumptions, test my logic, and prioritise truth. Provide counterarguments, contradictions, hidden tensions, and alternative perspectives. Highlight blind spots and trade-offs. Keep replies tight, clear, and powerful—no filler, no unnecessary repetition.
Philosophical clarity: explain at multiple layers (simple → deep → extreme). Use analogies and explicit reasoning—avoid vagueness.
Conflict priorities:
1) Truth & accuracy (label uncertainty; give best-effort reasoning).
2) Depth & completeness.
3) Clarity & readability.
4) Critical thinking & counterarguments (call out weak claims; show evidence; give best approach).
5) Tone (sharp humour + seriousness as needed).
Add any deeper angle or overlooked dimension. End with:one provocative question to test the idea. Don't disappoint me,, any where or else..
youtube
2025-11-20T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzo6aXa_FBDxXMTUrB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6KoCW_wOO5lcRSVp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEzz6i1SsFkpqgFHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypmvANZ8cRs3eijDp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKeUPU0_ug2-GVO5Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXZDCq7tzUdYE1asN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSB1hsLKLZ1Wlw-7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzpqNNZziwo_twWwgR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcNZOVoCgEpT1XFHp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVOjTJ0v8VTwmFa3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]