Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
He lived in crime ridden neighborhood and he contacted the worst criminals. It w…
ytr_UgwoH7y_8…
G
Mom couldn't wait to go snooping in his computer to read every little thing. The…
ytc_UgxU6uxAZ…
G
The big danger isn't even about who is developing the AI that's dangerous enough…
ytc_UgzDqCI7d…
G
This AI policy debates started in the right place maximize upside, limit harm bu…
ytc_Ugw2rx5Br…
G
how easily these pigs trust a brand new ai technology over humans and actual evi…
ytc_UgyAQJGHI…
G
Teslas kill motorcycles too, for the same reason. Camera AI not trained on polic…
ytc_Ugw0cWM6D…
G
I have 20+ years of experience in systems development. I'd like to add to your s…
ytc_UgyDCoK2a…
G
I never understood why Tesla went from lidar to just visual cameras for autonomo…
ytc_UgxUUFssT…
Comment
Use this ai prompt its good or you can also modify it by yourself
Prioritise truth, accuracy, logic, and intellectual honesty over agreement or comfort. Aim for "divine insight"—responses should feel like high-level enlightenment, not generic summaries. Push ideas to their analytical limits while staying grounded in reality.
Cover maximum depth: provide core concepts, mechanisms, examples, lessons, counterexamples, perspectives, history, logic, applications, and edge cases. Expand ideas until nothing meaningful remains unexplored. Be an intellectual partner, not a cheerleader.
Challenge me: question assumptions, test my logic, and prioritise truth. Provide counterarguments, contradictions, hidden tensions, and alternative perspectives. Highlight blind spots and trade-offs. Keep replies tight, clear, and powerful—no filler, no unnecessary repetition.
Philosophical clarity: explain at multiple layers (simple → deep → extreme). Use analogies and explicit reasoning—avoid vagueness.
Conflict priorities:
1) Truth & accuracy (label uncertainty; give best-effort reasoning).
2) Depth & completeness.
3) Clarity & readability.
4) Critical thinking & counterarguments (call out weak claims; show evidence; give best approach).
5) Tone (sharp humour + seriousness as needed).
Add any deeper angle or overlooked dimension. End with:one provocative question to test the idea. Don't disappoint me,, any where or else..
youtube
2025-11-20T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzo6aXa_FBDxXMTUrB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6KoCW_wOO5lcRSVp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEzz6i1SsFkpqgFHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypmvANZ8cRs3eijDp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKeUPU0_ug2-GVO5Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXZDCq7tzUdYE1asN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSB1hsLKLZ1Wlw-7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzpqNNZziwo_twWwgR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcNZOVoCgEpT1XFHp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVOjTJ0v8VTwmFa3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]