Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As long as Oligarch Trump is ur president it will become even worse , he forces …
ytr_UgxrYTXgq…
G
The AI specifically created those suicidal ideations though, it created a false …
ytr_UgzFzDJNe…
G
7:38 "if you export the hard parts ..." seems to imply you're saying that the ro…
ytc_Ugyzu7-YJ…
G
At this point, AI just plays along with whatever people ask. The AI registers as…
ytc_UgzoYafH9…
G
When the employer sees she generated her cover letter using ai, that job offer i…
ytc_Ugw8oEeRu…
G
Its crazy where AI is now compared to 1 month ago. AI as we know it isnt even at…
ytc_UgzPbSG8w…
G
Evil Corrupt Satanic Insanity 👎💩👎 AI is the ENEMY..so are the geeks who develope…
ytc_UgwwbGcJZ…
G
I work in mental health and to be fair, a lot of people essentially use ChatGPT …
ytc_Ugy01xL0q…
Comment
I'm disappointed by this video. It acknowledges the tropes of subservience, it points to people integrating it in their daily thinking, but then it wholeheartedly jumps into the "machines are property" bandwagon uncritically.
I can't help but hear that word "property" the very same way I hear "I own a human being, slaves are property". And even when I make an effort not to, it leaves me with the capitalist private property concept where you can just own people, planets, ideas, and so on with minimal pushback. And if I do my best to not think of that, then what's left is personal/necessary property, like "that is my bed" meaning it's the one I use, not the one I signed a contract for. Or like "my boyfriend", meaning the person I consider a boyfriend to me. In which case I think I'm losing the point or the phrasing would benefit from some tweaking.
Owning a robot is one thing. Owning a digital/silicon person is another. We can deny all day long that it's a possibility for the future, but when the future comes and we've done nothing but deny it... how can we ever have a healthy reaction? Especially considering what we know of the past and how denialism has often led people to avoiding accountability for a rapidly approaching problem.
youtube
2025-09-17T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzHfcmjunPQ0q8ap9V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_d9ehTCn3sX3HhRp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHEipns1I6xX3_ofF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWGqJRiP6lFEMOIHl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCpOlwALY8hoOdDT94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDDPL1sKJcbt8Rimx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNOy32lhmOfgOeyOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1k1JspGo4dKJTpMV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzYVfQ109hDMgtqvOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHhkfC_5SvMtWWUwh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]