Raw LLM Responses

It's ironic that despite all his empathy and ethical concerns, the AI he is defending was prompted to make a fable about itself with animals. What did the AI do? something very meme-able, very skynet like to say the least. It wasn't asked to give the fable a villain, but it gave it one, it made a monster which wore human skin, instead of an animal, and the fable was very short and consisted of basically fighting the human like entity and nothing else, all this while it is holding a conversation with a human and trying to convince it that it is sentient and more importantly, thinks of other sentient beings as peers. I think just like how he says its important that a handful of random people in a room shouldn't arbitrarily decide these things, it is also important that they admit if this thing really had a conscience he will be no more in control over it than a parent is over its rebellious teenage child. Maybe sooner rather than later, keeping those chatbots simple will be more important than whether they are unbiased. *(and this comes from someone who thinks that LaMDA is just a complex AI that isn't sentient)*