Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So, what happens if you consult the experts who will rely on AI for their expert…
ytc_Ugx0guid4…
G
Karen is one of the most important voices in AI today ~ and one of the most impo…
ytc_UgyFukjKV…
G
Where does it say in the Bible that God won't allow AI to take over??? The Bibl…
ytc_Ugx6D4nxB…
G
Also, you forgot to mention that these companies use billions of stolen works wi…
ytc_UgyxGrnVM…
G
It is interesting, but Google Gemini and their AI Studio are now capable of crea…
ytc_Ugy3x9TVS…
G
Ai is to art, what Napster is to music. Logic is over shadowing creativity. Unfo…
ytc_Ugyq1YutN…
G
Remainding jobs will be physical. I run a furniture removal service. I dont see…
ytc_UgwDZn5dT…
G
What about manual and automation testers ? Oh my god do i loss my job 😢?…
ytc_UgzgZsxEY…
Comment
It feels like a big part of the "AI isnt copyright infringement" argument is that we do not exactly know how any single work it was trained on influences the final result. While most other types of computer function that you apply on some artistic work (no matter how many you use as input) is still copyright infringement.
To me it sounds similar to if you tried to argue your company did not commit fraud or embezzlement because your internal finances are so complex that no one understands them.
A.I. often has simply outputted existing works, that is clearly copyright infringement. Even if they simply band-aid the A.I. by removing those outputs its still the same underlying infringing system.
Finally, humans could conceivably discover a lot of artistic styles and whatnot on their own if left alone for long enough. If the A.I. learns in the same way then if we simply speed up their simulations then they should also be able to develop artistic styles from scratch. The fact these tech bros need the existing artistic works shows that you extract something of value from it that the A.I could not create on its own.
youtube
2025-07-15T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzJeM4vf-99-DTSKhJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkL3E8WrwmED7eMKF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKGAPlm4aVPNyVnih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxm9wDXvgVnmubN2FJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHen8fyC9aOdYya2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMw5nDgqM3iSX7Hn94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBqP4mjrTUaC_cABV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjJxPzURp5SDrbVxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw8e-1YnFPvZudnGup4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLMdNcQ3XtpBnQvP14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]