Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is a must-watch for anyone interested in the future of AI. Geoffrey Hinton’…
ytc_Ugz7Vw6qc…
G
I suggest that an aspect of this conversation that needs more attention and disc…
ytc_UgyP-Jirp…
G
There should be a government clause that says: you’re allowed to use AI… but you…
rdc_j6gc78t
G
I think we are completely prepared to use our instincts and deal with artificial…
ytc_UgxrsXwHi…
G
It would benefit them tho, unless you want to post all the math you did that pro…
ytr_UgxPLmrJW…
G
This may sound crazy, but I'm routing for the AI to win, I'm hoping that they se…
ytc_Ugxjl9H8p…
G
He's just worried his Neuralink Company is gone down the toilet with the advance…
ytc_UgwVSUeF7…
G
@AnonimontheAnon “all the friend did was resell sirpyes art after feeding it to …
ytr_Ugxkek3ot…
Comment
A lot of the money for a ubi would come from rich people paying taxes.
The only way a member of the bourgeoise can profit from this is if the money they make from people paying with their ubi is greater than the amount that this member of the bourgeoise contributed to that buyer's ubi.
So my conclusion is that ubi would only benefit those who safe more money from automation then they contribute to ubi. But if the economy becomes fully automated then only the rich could possibly contribute to the ubi and hence a new 1% of the 1% would be created.
This 1% of the 1% would be the the owners of businesses that make up a really large amount of what people want to buy.
This 1% of the 1% would accumulate money from the 99% of the 1% who contribute more to ubi then they get out of it. This is because the ubi money that profits the 1% of the 1% must be coming from somewhere and as we've established it can't bet the 99%.
I look forward to this 0.99% complaining about oppression.
youtube
2021-03-09T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4UwmXj8-9eUjQoJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugznw77bkxw1KuIowWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaZO6frH5RAULN15J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVXh3NA0-UKs7DSOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGRsyq2MoNrPVwc-p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7ClEQM6iPKWcTH2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyeYAzpSX0KZgAJil4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKqiIHphB7g9TKc694AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwObQuRUlVZqWZWZqN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZgJcWPLh277vhoaJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]