Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Why can’t we just invest in people living full healthy happy lives instead of st…
ytc_UgweM0AeB…
G
just let the decision made by a RNG.. problem solved. also i'm pretty sure that …
ytc_UgjkwzfB0…
G
Can this perform fellatio? I am a scientist so please do not take this question …
ytc_UgyGT2H_Y…
G
AI makes you doubt your understanding of the world around you if it doesn't fit …
ytc_Ugxy6KQeU…
G
It's important to approach this with empathy and patience, as confronting someon…
rdc_m2br16j
G
I also disagree with the premise at the end that robots are “racist” or “sexist.…
ytc_UgxKGWBEH…
G
It's so sad that older folks aren't getting educated on this stuff. Other countr…
rdc_liwjbwi
G
We appreciate your engagement with our content. While the topic of human extinct…
ytr_UgyvAldzZ…
Comment
A lot of the money for a ubi would come from rich people paying taxes.
The only way a member of the bourgeoise can profit from this is if the money they make from people paying with their ubi is greater than the amount that this member of the bourgeoise contributed to that buyer's ubi.
So my conclusion is that ubi would only benefit those who safe more money from automation then they contribute to ubi. But if the economy becomes fully automated then only the rich could possibly contribute to the ubi and hence a new 1% of the 1% would be created.
This 1% of the 1% would be the the owners of businesses that make up a really large amount of what people want to buy.
This 1% of the 1% would accumulate money from the 99% of the 1% who contribute more to ubi then they get out of it. This is because the ubi money that profits the 1% of the 1% must be coming from somewhere and as we've established it can't bet the 99%.
I look forward to this 0.99% complaining about oppression.
youtube
2021-03-09T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4UwmXj8-9eUjQoJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugznw77bkxw1KuIowWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaZO6frH5RAULN15J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVXh3NA0-UKs7DSOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGRsyq2MoNrPVwc-p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7ClEQM6iPKWcTH2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyeYAzpSX0KZgAJil4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKqiIHphB7g9TKc694AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwObQuRUlVZqWZWZqN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZgJcWPLh277vhoaJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]