Raw LLM Responses

guys I dont know if further into the video this would be mentioned, but there is a strong problem with intelectual property, the ai is capable of elaborating permutations say for example of a image or video of a flower or or some sort of animal, the input is mostly human made images and videos, acomulated in all countries in the world, regardles of if the source is old or new, so input is human made, the ai provides permutations of a thing that would have never have been made if us, the user, didnt ask it to do it, nor if we didnt apply sertain peks or characteristics that make it unike, so the IP should be the property of the user, perhaps with a nice percentage shared to the ai, but then are they paying the source material and autors ho createed images and source material that was used to train the ai?, in the case of neil, he already stated that ai, or the ppl ho train it, stold the content of his books. The severe current ordeal is, millions of ideas of all types have been generated thanks to users, users ho in many times are in desperate need of cash. these ai companies are keeping a copy of most of what the user creates, so just from this, they can and most likely will indeed make millions or billionsof dollars, just from what a single user creates, and they do not plan to pay the user a dime, on the contrary they charge the user, despite in many times the user revealing to the ai, that they are indeed in a dire situation. the owner of the ai, wont step up to help the user and will let the user live tru horrors, the owner of the ai, will let the user go homeless and die, despite the user having created millions or billions in cash for that ai company, thatnks to the user input.