Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The intelligence singularity (or whatever it's called) comes off a lot like nucl…
ytc_UgxwlTxtn…
G
You’re just pushing your narrative, if ai has the ability to become sentient don…
ytc_UgxIRgC1Q…
G
Is it just me, but both of these guys look and sound like AI. 😂.…
ytc_UgxjePdU3…
G
What's scary isn't ai out performing humans, what's scary is human being too afr…
ytc_Ugy1K19fF…
G
We appreciate your humor! Sophia does have a lot to share, but it's all in the p…
ytr_UgylY3_sO…
G
I don't get the hate. Roger Haus was a successful artist long before AI became a…
ytc_UgznBGaDZ…
G
If that guy's an artist for writing prompts for an AI, I'm a surgeon for placing…
ytc_Ugw-tF6b1…
G
my main question is why people defend AI like their lives depend on it. what ACT…
ytc_Ugy1QS-PJ…
Comment
One of these days I am just going to report this channel for misinformation and start blocking it. For the record, when Computer Animation and 3D animation first came around, it was the same argument, but to get the REAL details out:
1. The surpreme court simply did not hear the case, meaning it did not make a ruling. This meant the previous ruling of the lower court held, which of course stated that you need substantial human involvement or human authorship.
2. AI art CAN be copyritten as long as there was substantial human authorship. It was not the fact that the plantive was wrong, it was the fact the way the plantive argued the case that was wrong
3. It was done without prejudice, meaning it can return to the court if he redoes the argument which happens a lot.
Legal Eagle did a video on this a long time ago and figured the case was going to go this way when it was passed to the court. He stated clearly that more than likely it was going to fail not because it shouldn't be eligable, but because the way the argument was framed.
But here is the issue. Some company desgined a new rocket nozel using AI, and it WAS copyrighted 2 years ago, meaning if he redid his argument he coudl appeal. I doubt he will, but I can bet a big studio problem will eventually.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-03-05T23:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxwbsq1CUZ2VRgM-IF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFgHxyWGI5guKQsd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMC035gxMGZXBpxOt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2lMfdgellbAz39kB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyPC1vVTCPK0jGsMZ54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwytTozUG9fjo3oVxV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLrqQD4AzL1noj3p94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfZKdZU0HsFb2BT4R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWGi5JT_ngyjZrsb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugysp4ozPG8ey5gvPK54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]