Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The way in which you speak about AI in learning seems to lead to the idea that i…
ytc_UgzkUl5X6…
G
I hate headlines like these. People who have no experience in machine learning t…
rdc_dlujoc0
G
My feed is filled with doom and gloom from AI job apocalypse to US collapse. But…
ytc_UgywOJnW4…
G
No you can't remove the bias from Ai, the only use of intelligence is to make de…
ytr_UgxtPwjZQ…
G
Had to stop listening at 4 minutes when she is handed a softball question, "what…
ytc_UgyJTO9fa…
G
My AI I'm just coming out of the the forest basically introducing my AI to other…
ytc_Ugw9EXJQ6…
G
I think there are many people who still want certain things done by humans. When…
ytc_Ugz-pr7Sg…
G
AI is a baby, feed it with gentle care. Limit it up to your usage only, before i…
ytc_UgyT2Yxuv…
Comment
Yes, since it is programmed to do so but how well depends entirely on what skillset the company is really in need of. It will be more sensible to understand and agreeable that the interviews are done by HR personnel to validate their communicative skills and talents contribution as they will be working with people and not A.I afterall.
The implicit bias here is the gathering of comments from people exposed to acknowledge that companies should be diverse as an ethical necessity. The explicit bias here is people assuming, A.I cannot do this hiring task without human input, and also knowing broader ethnic group will be subject to dismissal by default.
Overreacting to the implementation of A.I to recruit for diversity remains at the discretion of companies who want to believe such an integration of technology will aid them ethically. It does portrait a fair and just selection process that removes the explicit biases from both company personnel and recruiters. The end phrase is "no one owes someone any favors."
youtube
2018-04-24T18:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxoMfnVH8J5YG2R93x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbyvIOsJuSjR3n_qp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvP7FKCvljGBVDb9t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgychdteduZgTWujJN94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgytzR9pJMI0F-VDwwF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxS6kAuYbdHrvLNsjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMSYnFvuM9PHPoX6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2_Le55of8szem3Yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPxL5OG7I7sdioh0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_atSeIOkvUoHYBWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]