Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The medical profession is highly regulated. Otherwise, people would be already e…
ytc_Ugz5sP4tg…
G
Incredible show- just subscribed. These depth of knowledge conversations surroun…
ytc_UgzZ9wd9A…
G
As an artist I've tried out AI image generation extensively (stable diffusion, t…
ytc_UgxeAiTjJ…
G
Hey, option D is the correct answer.
The contest is over and winners have been …
ytr_Ugwm31mk0…
G
Everyone hates on AI artists, even when they kindly remind us to file our taxes…
ytc_Ugw_b3bR2…
G
Automatically made me think of ‘Friday’
Smokey : Why you not goin' to work?
Cr…
rdc_hibfgx9
G
I think the artificial intelligence battle is more between US and China! We, as …
ytc_UgwYWSHJP…
G
AI won’t ruin humanity.
Humanity will — if we keep handing global power to peopl…
ytc_UgxFT46qr…
Comment
Yes, since it is programmed to do so but how well depends entirely on what skillset the company is really in need of. It will be more sensible to understand and agreeable that the interviews are done by HR personnel to validate their communicative skills and talents contribution as they will be working with people and not A.I afterall.
The implicit bias here is the gathering of comments from people exposed to acknowledge that companies should be diverse as an ethical necessity. The explicit bias here is people assuming, A.I cannot do this hiring task without human input, and also knowing broader ethnic group will be subject to dismissal by default.
Overreacting to the implementation of A.I to recruit for diversity remains at the discretion of companies who want to believe such an integration of technology will aid them ethically. It does portrait a fair and just selection process that removes the explicit biases from both company personnel and recruiters. The end phrase is "no one owes someone any favors."
youtube
2018-04-24T18:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxoMfnVH8J5YG2R93x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbyvIOsJuSjR3n_qp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvP7FKCvljGBVDb9t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgychdteduZgTWujJN94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgytzR9pJMI0F-VDwwF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxS6kAuYbdHrvLNsjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMSYnFvuM9PHPoX6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2_Le55of8szem3Yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPxL5OG7I7sdioh0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_atSeIOkvUoHYBWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]