Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G When Sophia mentioned balancing AI with human needs, it reminded me how AICarma … ytc_Ugwpcz_uv… G This is all done on purpose, this is not the first time these chat bots have tal… ytc_UgzgvY-fk… G I hope that all artists start doing this some day soon so the AI slop stops work… ytc_UgybbiRQc… G Every couple of days a similar pic comes up, unless you manage to recreate it in… rdc_oekxqyx G We literally have an entire trilogy of games (Mass Effect) that tell us why unre… ytc_Uggc-9bes… G That's a great point! Wisdom is often tied to experience and emotional understan… ytr_Ugz4BdGtA… G This be way I will never, I’m sorry was that too soft NEVER get into a driverles… ytc_UgyGUqSV8… G I have no sympathy for any of these people, I hope the female streamers lost a b… ytc_UgzU72ZEw…

Comment

When “reverse socialism” is fine for capital, but UBI is a “handout” to labor... The diagnosis of AI-driven displacement, weak labor power, and massive subsidies for capital (“reverse socialism,” as Jon put it) was hitting on a lot of significant issues. My spidey sense tingled a bit when the guests were praising globalization for reducing extreme global poverty without touching on the exploitation of the Global South. It all came together near the end when they touched on Universal Basic Income (David Autor: “I hate UBI!” wut??), and the limits of the conversation became painfully clear. Redistribution upward is treated as normal, if not the professors’ explicit preference, while redistribution downward is framed as something that would destroy the economy (“millions of people not working would destroy the economy!” lol). What’s the data showing that *everyone* would stop working if their basic needs were met? It’s wild because it was an intelligent discourse, but it was also very self-limiting. These folks seem only capable of operating within the existing paradigm of capitalism and are consciously (and emotionally?) constraining both their imagination and their tolerance for “acceptable” solutions. They can map the consequences of the system in great detail, but never get anywhere near questioning the system itself.

youtube AI Governance 2026-04-22T23:4… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgynOHfES6ydb7xQKqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy76R2rzw77QVeOXyR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwgjgQxo3UeFHBvR-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyN-aa-ptj766oStN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1oeuder8y9ic2Sfh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFGwx-qcusGIcrRu94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7FqwmZl21ogI3HS54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFXn2j7ZxjWKUd8Ox4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDtdiuOyNzpB_088F4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7WvN5uEjtjR3_-Dh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses