Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G "Why don't you just Google for reference images?". Because the Google results ar… ytc_UgwZJ9rJb… G A guy have not been trying autonomous car, using outdated data and uneducated su… ytc_UgzYPogie… G It doesn't make sense. Companies will need to pay taxes to sustain the populatio… ytr_Ugwj-XJHH… G If it becomes illegal to distribute pictures that were given to you without rest… rdc_co6ap1y G Still, from a distance, it looks convincing, but the moment it moves, the uncann… ytc_UgwMuCh_F… G @TheSkysCloud nah I'm not saying art is inherently useless it just takes a leve… ytr_UgzMNPiz3… G Police Director Robert Hubner Prosecutor Christopher Kuberiet Judge David Stahl … ytc_UgzgfNfgw… G Maybe AI knows more about dark skin people and their origin, and it's not being … ytc_UgxYNPebl…

Comment

When “reverse socialism” is fine for capital, but UBI is a “handout” to labor... The diagnosis of AI-driven displacement, weak labor power, and massive subsidies for capital (“reverse socialism,” as Jon put it) was hitting on a lot of significant issues. My spidey sense tingled a bit when the guests were praising globalization for reducing extreme global poverty without touching on the exploitation of the Global South. It all came together near the end when they touched on Universal Basic Income (David Autor: “I hate UBI!” wut??), and the limits of the conversation became painfully clear. Redistribution upward is treated as normal, if not the professors’ explicit preference, while redistribution downward is framed as something that would destroy the economy (“millions of people not working would destroy the economy!” lol). What’s the data showing that *everyone* would stop working if their basic needs were met? It’s wild because it was an intelligent discourse, but it was also very self-limiting. These folks seem only capable of operating within the existing paradigm of capitalism and are consciously (and emotionally?) constraining both their imagination and their tolerance for “acceptable” solutions. They can map the consequences of the system in great detail, but never get anywhere near questioning the system itself.

youtube AI Governance 2026-04-22T23:4… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgynOHfES6ydb7xQKqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy76R2rzw77QVeOXyR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwgjgQxo3UeFHBvR-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyN-aa-ptj766oStN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1oeuder8y9ic2Sfh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFGwx-qcusGIcrRu94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7FqwmZl21ogI3HS54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFXn2j7ZxjWKUd8Ox4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDtdiuOyNzpB_088F4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7WvN5uEjtjR3_-Dh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses