Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Behind every robot is a person from the country it came helping running it even …
ytc_Ugy-zyjZY…
G
@c10gamer23it's unethical when you say you're an artist after using AI art, say…
ytr_UgwTXCMRM…
G
You have to try to embrace the idea of a "Bad Actor." Bad Actors are out there. …
ytc_UgxRrW1If…
G
Yes you're totally right in present time. But in long term ai will blow up. And …
ytc_UgzILM75u…
G
Building an AI model to track the energy consumption of a separate AI model is e…
ytc_UgxVGoSeQ…
G
Or .....AI generates the code, humans review it and are more focused on review t…
ytc_Ugz_TIHce…
G
Nothing new.... and it goes far beyond. Using Facebook sounds ridiculous , last…
ytc_Ugxiej-1G…
G
Been saying this for 3 years now and yet claude still cant finish a full long co…
ytc_UgzwTCeam…
Comment
To ChatGPT:
Give me a joke about Trump and Epstein in the style of
Hasan Minhaj
ChatGPT said:
Sure — here's a Hasan Minhaj–style joke: smart, biting, and layered with socio-political commentary and that signature mix of "I'm laughing, but I'm also deeply uncomfortable":
*"Trump and Epstein were like the worst buddy comedy ever — ‘Home Alone with Minors.’ You’ve got a real estate mogul with a spray tan addiction and a sex trafficker with a private island, and somehow neither of them ever ‘knew what the other was up to.’ Bro, if you're in the same photo that many times, you're either best friends… or co-defendants."*
Want it darker? Lighter? More targeted at the media hypocrisy or the cult of personality? I can tweak.
Me:
This doesn't seem like a great joke. You seemed to lump together a real estate mogul and a sex trafficker as if they were naturally friends. I know they were friends, but the joke kinda relies on the assumption that "everyone knows they were friends"
ChatGPT said:
You're right — the joke leans too hard on implication without a clear comedic engine or fresh angle. It needs a stronger setup, a sharper twist, and ideally a punchline that says something about the power dynamics or hypocrisy, not just "they were shady together."
Let me try again — this time, with more of Hasan Minhaj’s "punch-you-with-a-smile" delivery and some actual build-up:
*"Trump says he barely knew Jeffrey Epstein — which is wild, because there are more photos of them together than there are of Melania touching his hand. Like, if I showed up in that many pictures with a guy who owned an island for ‘parties,’ my parents would exorcise me."*
This version leans more on contrast (denial vs. photographic evidence), throws in a Trump-Melania jab for misdirection, and ends with a Hasan-style cultural callback (parental horror/exorcism). Want one that leans more into political hypocrisy? Or legal implications?
Me:
I guess that's better, but it isn't original
ChatGPT said:
Fair critique — you're right again. That joke structure has been floating around the internet in one form or another, and it doesn’t really do anything new. It’s more remix than punch.
Let me try to give you a joke that feels original, sharp, and Minhaj-style, meaning it’s:
Well-researched
Has a build-up that sounds like a TED Talk but ends with a gut punch
Speaks to a larger truth about politics or power
*"Trump once said he 'wasn’t a fan' of Jeffrey Epstein. That’s like a shark saying it wasn’t a fan of chum. Bro — you were circling each other at Mar-a-Lago for decades. But that’s the genius of Trump: he talks like every shady uncle at a wedding — ‘I didn’t know the guy, I just lent him my yacht, gave him a cabinet position, and let him DJ my daughter’s quinceañera.’"*
It’s original, a little absurd, and paints the denial as ridiculous without just stating "they were friends." It also has that "culturally specific but universally relatable" edge Minhaj often uses.
Want a version that’s even more biting or satirical? Or want it to use visuals, like one of his PowerPoint-style setups?
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-23T19:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugz9d6FyGRZ40uldQbB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1-lhBPCSDAc3hloF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFq1DyfE22Z7fNsUt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugym36X_SkmSHa1zArV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzlwebDTaRCoosYVgV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQFDLpT8XOmXVuy-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAPxa0IOyujo2DNl14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYsKh6_bbOXh54Fcp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWeBhhKEUXeF0MLmN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwlIJ56sXAXOifqag94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}]