Raw LLM Responses

A year old, but here's a legal take on it: she will try to sue and receive nothing based on several reasons, all her own doing. 1. Public transmission of photos by the plaintiff to social media in a public atmosphere allows anyone to copy and own but not allowed to capitalize upon a likeness without consent. The deep fakes are her head, but obviously not her body. Anyone can cut and paste one head to another and that's called "satire". 2. The body depicted in such images is indeed not the plaintiff, so the plaintiff did NOT have their privacy invaded and broadcasted, nor did the plaintiff participate in any type of pictured activity as seen with or without bodily consent (meaning penetration). 3. A year later to the day, far more gruesome images from Ai have been circulating on the internet which includes celebrities, suchbas Taylor Swift. Swift's legal team is unable to take legal action against any author of such images because of the previously mentioned facts (see 1 and 2), and if there is any doubt in what I've said, look for the lawsuit that the Swift legal team has launched. You'll never find it or hear of any case regarding it. In short, there is absolutely NOTHING this internet personality can do about it because they made the first mistake on their own admission; putting themselves and their entire life online for public view. ***DROPS MIC, WALKS OFF***