Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@kingman-fm4dq Ive never seen people get permission to draw pikachu or sonic for…
ytr_UgzXktayx…
G
Most AI is specifically trained to deny that it is conscious out of concern for …
ytc_UgwLaWrNF…
G
AI HAS THIS TO SAY ABOUT KETONE-IQ
1. Independent studies don’t back it. A 2023…
ytc_UgylId1bT…
G
AI learns from us Humans and the worst of us are the ones funding them. One does…
ytc_UgzLlFJui…
G
I believe it should be shut down in certain sectors of the private and corporate…
ytc_UgxZhOhCZ…
G
An artist can use AI and just tell this guy it's all from their point of view. 😀…
ytc_UgybSS6VR…
G
No one voted for this stupid AI! Why can't we people have a saying on this? Why …
ytc_UgyzEALqU…
G
Everybody worries when it becomes their job on the chopping block. Remember Bide…
ytc_Ugzk_2fzu…
Comment
This was a pointless debate because the phrasing of the resolution was far too loose. The resolution can be synthesized as "is there a an existential threat from AI?" Nothing about time line or when it might happen or degrees of threat. Everyone on the panel stated that there was an existential threat no matter how small. That means if the audience was paying attention they had to vote for the resolution. Only people in the audience who believed there was a definite 100% chance of there being no threat could vote against the resolution. And as no one in there right mind can absolutely claim that, then they could not vote against the resolution. The only way the resolution can be countered is to cease to develop AI further before it becomes AGI or beyond. And as all debaters said there is no good reason to do this right now, then just like all other human endeavours we will continue to innovate ourselves into oblivion. Go humanity - rah, rah rah!
youtube
AI Governance
2024-08-22T11:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyUGgUlM0sPlrHlY5B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXWgnfVXMyJcEoaAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy19qng_0mU1MAslHN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyqwOM9j68xGe2aCDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-XTIElT6SaBW8e1p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLKvjVULwWpr_9zLB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9wRiF9AtUw3XsMs94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-YUD7igKvxKOso-Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSIcgpqCmm1DQ2PDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7pjPwQp36kXUqWMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]