Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
yeah, i miss when ai's only purpose was to be laughed at because it was so bat i…
ytr_UgwDPgqa0…
G
The company I work for was going to get a contract for the city we work in to ma…
rdc_fuqj0tq
G
The AI got as good as us. I guess it's time to simply GET BETTER.…
ytc_UgyDFENbi…
G
Damn! That was done well. Wish they would have shown him knock down the robot fi…
ytc_UgzGfksG9…
G
They're focused on making AI better at coding so it can be used to design better…
ytr_UgwKJRxDw…
G
"They will help us put the groceries away"
What an oddly specific reason for a …
ytc_UghzeLeRt…
G
It's a complicated argument. I've been on both sides and I've chosen AI in the e…
ytc_UgyleBsgD…
G
The most ridiculous thing of it all is that he even isn't an AI Artist is you re…
ytc_Ugy29HT2e…
Comment
Excellent thought experiment, but the video ignores some of the possible outcomes. It is quite likely that most of the other cars on the road will also be SDCs (self-driving cars), which means that they may be able to react in time to avoid a collision all together. Consider: an SDC could actively keep track of what other cars on the road are automated vs. driven by humans at all times. In the event of a potential accident (such as the falling boxes) the SDC could put out a "distress signal" to the other SDCs on the road, and then swerve towards them. The other SDCs could then accommodate the swerving car by moving to the side, accelerating, or hitting the brakes, and they could do this with the knowledge of what other cars around them would and would not (i.e. human-driven cars) be able to react in time. Thus in many situations an accident could be avoided all together.
That said, there is still a chance that all the cars around you are human driven, so the video's thought experiment is still relevant.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2017-06-25T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UggQprZepafZ1HgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UghRftAajpYgC3gCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiVNu11IS5PiHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugis3gL-vgXrpHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj3h2tFVAqPSngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj5A0pJm2zcoXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggIGhHRenxDK3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjS60trIUKAvHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggCEcSJA552hHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgitMxhB_OZFhXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]