Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
androids in the workplace is a fallacy. When Optimus works well enough, it will …
ytr_UgyqYvNg_…
G
You are clearly coming at this with a bias already, also if people are unequal, …
ytr_Ugzgytqux…
G
I can understand a concept artist using an ai that they trained on exclusively t…
ytc_UgxoknEBy…
G
About religion, it is a wrong conclusion. Maybe all the religions observed and d…
ytc_Ugxp4aF6W…
G
Bro, I quit programming 10 years ago because the vast majority of employees are …
ytc_UgycdKCKf…
G
So basically, the AI Companies are developing AI tech to take over our society a…
ytc_UgwNqZ1oG…
G
You know as an artist trying to grow seeing all this News of A.i is really makin…
ytc_Ugx9XYabc…
G
I'd love AI to recommend to stop breathing
But thank you very much for having re…
ytc_UgxkpdOr1…
Comment
I think in the long term, autonomous weapons will be better and safer than human wielded weapons. We can program them not to feel fear, not to kill to protect itself. We can program them to not be racist. We can program them not to feel a primitive need to feel strong and violently put down anyone who disrespects them And that is in addition to them not getting tired or bored.
People have an abysmal track record when it comes to choosing when to use a weapon.
Of course, there are concerns, autonomous weapons are powerful, and if they can be hacked to easily that is a major problem, and if they are programmed by the same people who think bombing a wedding because someone there once had a conversation with a terrorist, that is a serious problem. But we are already bombing those weddings. We could instead program autonomous weapons to have far higher standards, and more respect for human life.
The advantages of well engineered autonomy are so great that it will worth doing, but it is worth taking things slowly, and being thoughtful and deliberate in how we build and deploy these systems.
youtube
2015-07-31T04:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugh4Y0du4dZ53ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj9S7He4JB8SngCoAEC","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg35B6pH_UxTngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UggYXi1L41uO13gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgixNw6ZI8gvlngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh6JtGH2uCypngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjKo0rMFtp5cHgCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UghUF7sRctjnPXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiMWJhekJHrLHgCoAEC","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjoe2j6EEqhTngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]