Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
"Working will be optional because we'll have robots; plus AI and in a _benign sc…
ytc_UgxaQPGIm…
G
I'm actually sad that AI art is hated on so much. No i don't mean the "artists" …
ytc_UgyjSRPYo…
G
AI will destroy humans.. its creator.
And you are worrying about a job replacem…
ytr_UgySFY2gW…
G
And then I had AI read Dr. Yamploskiy's works and apply to what my children shou…
ytc_UgzDCBgs1…
G
trust me, all human art is way better than ai. ai is effortless, but human art i…
ytc_UgwQQiHMx…
G
Btw Tesla’s don’t steer away if humans it just steered away because the person w…
ytc_UgxhlpS5j…
G
The nightmare scenario is that a human being is having an actual conversation wi…
ytc_Ugz3Xbswa…
G
They tell you what they are doing and then add the word AI so it sounds all mode…
ytc_UgwHlOzRq…
Comment
So, the progress ethic pushes suggests that should move forward with new technologies because that is how we change our norm and when considering it, we should not take into account the potential dangers involved? I can follow that for robots and AI with little objection .... but when I apply that to other fields where incredible progress has recently been made I come across several personal objections.
Recently Crispr and gene drives, recent technologies that can allow us to rewrite the DNA and genomes of entire species, should be moved forward for progress' sake despite the very clear implication that that progress can get out of hand and destroy ecosysyems, wipe out entire species, and create diseases that can "racially cleanse"? It affects the status quo in the same way as AI and robots could. Though I think we can all agree that would be bad.
At what point does the ethics of progress need to be countered/considered with a morality of progress?
youtube
2016-06-28T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugi0VpRQcJ-dlXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiNbJ86LvBRq3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh1IEiVJXdTL3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UghLxJuzfSM6WngCoAEC","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UggsqieRRiXa53gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg4GbRqmgOic3gCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghxMbj5aY2YSHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UghdOZ7MnsH1QngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjiENPkdW5qpHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UghmqNgxlJSGC3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}
]